Related Communities :  Central |  Ski |  Skateboard |  Snowmobile |  Mountain Bike |  Surf |  Wakeboard |  More...

Skip Navigation
You are viewing this website with either CSS support turned off, or are not using a CSS compliant browser. This will significantly reduce your Colonies.com experience.

 Advertisement Advertise With Us

Snowboard.com Forums

Search only in this forum

Quit rewarding failure

Recieve Email Updates.
Verify your email to receive email notifications.
26-42 of 42 posts
Previous 1 2
slimp_dawg

Posts : 1821
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 27, 2009

^^^And keep in mind the tax structure and government policies of Clinton put us in a surplus, while Bush put us in a record deficit. All the tax breaks the rich are getting now are not leading to trickle down. The are heavily taxed, yet have the US has the least in tax REVENUE because of all the loopholes givin' to the rich corporations. So, in reality, they aren't payin much in taxes. And it's FACT that the top 4% went from controlling 9& of the wealth to 22% of the wealth in the US over the last 8 years. That doesn't seem like trickle down... it's the gaddamn opposite.

Obama is not denying that the deregulations of the banks was appropriate. And in fact, Bush had mulitiple chances over the last 8 years to do something about it. It was a good idea to get some stuff rolling, but after the writing was on the wall, some regulations needed to be stamped down and they weren't. What do you think Obama is going to do?

Now Lakia, let me ask you this. If you bust your ass, and make a good living, what do you consider A LOT of money. Would 200,000 a year be a lot. Maybe 250,000? If you bust your ass, and make 250,000, you're not getting taxed any more than you are today! Now, if you are one of those rich CEOs that's making MILLIONS, I could see why you might get pissed. I mean for fucks sake, you've been raping your employees for 8 plus years now. Not giving them pay raises to match the cost of living, yet increase the cost of your product. You've been giving yourself muli million dollar bonuses and higher pay every year. And now, when the country is in the shitter, you're asked to do your part and pay some extra taxes... you'll still make millions, though. But that's just down right UNAMERICAN to think that you should help out your country.

Pull your head out of your ass Lakia. YOU will NEVER make millions. YOU will NEVER make the amount of money that should make you concerned with Obama's tax structure. The reason the US is in the situation we're in is because EVERYONE is greedy. From the CEOs to the small minimum wage earner in Spokane. Greed. Gotta have my cars, flat screens, guns, snowboards, etc... and if I can't pay for it today, I'll slap down the credit card and pay it later. And with all that false "wealth" plastic gave us, we completely ignored the fact that we were not truly gaining wealth. We were digging ourselves deeper in to holes. We ignored the fact that while our credit went up, our pays stayed the same and products went up. But we didn't car because we were still getting stuff... no buying, getting, because we all used credit.

Personally, I like Bill Mahr's solution. Don't tax the corporations any more... however, here's the loophole. If the corporations are actually creating jobs, which by the way is what trickle down is SUPPOSES to do, then no extra taxes. However, if the do NOT create jobs (and not 1 or 2 positions here and there), then tax them. Because the reason to not tax them is to get them to pass that money down to the middle class. But that's not what's happening, so why give them that tax break! And remember, middle class is the buying power. Tax them, and they have less to spend. Give them a tax break and a pay raise and they buy more. Which puts more in the business owners pockets. If I had more money to spend, I'd hire a small contractor to remodel my downstairs... since I dont', I'm not, and there's some contractor out there that's out of work right now.

I draw all my own stunts


HATER_PLAYER
"In Your Face"

Posts : 8096
OFFLINE

Posted on Feb 27, 2009

Posted by slimp_dawg
Pull your head out of your ass Lakia. YOU will NEVER make millions. YOU will NEVER make the amount of money that should make you concerned with Obama's tax structure. The reason the US is in the situation we're in is because EVERYONE is greedy. From the CEOs to the small minimum wage earner in Spokane. Greed. Gotta have my cars, flat screens, guns, snowboards, etc... and if I can't pay for it today, I'll slap down the credit card and pay it later. And with all that false "wealth" plastic gave us, we completely ignored the fact that we were not truly gaining wealth. We were digging ourselves deeper in to holes. We ignored the fact that while our credit went up, our pays stayed the same and products went up. But we didn't car because we were still getting stuff... no buying, getting, because we all used credit.

 
hear hear!

Percula

Posts : 11
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 27, 2009

Posted by HATER_PLAYER
wow, where to begin....
and what about the millions of unemployed that will be choking the welfare rolls? do you even have any idea of how much money this will cost the government? you say that the laid-off people will get jobs eventually, but how long will that take, exactly? new businesses don't just spring up overnight.
 
You could start by having to pass a drug test before receiving your unemployment or welfare check.  That won't help releive all the pressure but, it would certainly "weed" out those sponging off the goverment.  I know i had to pass a drug test so I can help pay for unemployment assistance and welfare programs.  And yes if people try hard enough they will find work.  It may not be just like what they had or they may have to work more but there are jobs out there.  At least I hope so since I might be laid off in a couple of weeks.  But honestly I'm not that worried even though I don't have a degree because I'm not afraid of doing hard work or working more than one job.
Well I'm an energetic hypothetic version of another person
Check out my outsides there ain't nothing in here


slimp_dawg

Posts : 1821
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 27, 2009

^^^Uhmmm, I'm not too sure you can just find work right now. The company my wife works for had to lay off their shipping clerk recently. They had over 200 applicants in the FIRST day!! This is for a SMALL, company in a small neighborhood in Seattle... one of the cities that until recently, was doing OK with unemployment rates. And, to be a shipping clerk, you don't need a degree. This isn't a "white collar" job.

Jobs are far and few right now. And start ups and gonna be springin' up anytime soon, and if you haven't noticed, the large corporations are laying people off... and if not laying off, they're in "hiring freezes".

I draw all my own stunts


SpecialKallt...
"Intersting Jailbird"

Posts : 3572
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 27, 2009

Posted by HATER_PLAYER
Posted by slimp_dawg
Pull your head out of your ass Lakia. YOU will NEVER make millions. YOU will NEVER make the amount of money that should make you concerned with Obama's tax structure. The reason the US is in the situation we're in is because EVERYONE is greedy. From the CEOs to the small minimum wage earner in Spokane. Greed. Gotta have my cars, flat screens, guns, snowboards, etc... and if I can't pay for it today, I'll slap down the credit card and pay it later. And with all that false "wealth" plastic gave us, we completely ignored the fact that we were not truly gaining wealth. We were digging ourselves deeper in to holes. We ignored the fact that while our credit went up, our pays stayed the same and products went up. But we didn't car because we were still getting stuff... no buying, getting, because we all used credit.

 
hear hear!


besides the "Pull your head out of your ass Lakia. YOU will NEVER make millions. YOU will NEVER make the amount of money that should make you concerned with Obama's tax structure." part I will scream an almighty Here here! as well!

to say a man you do not even know personally will never make millions is ignorant.  I'd have to just assume you are self projecting onto Lakia.  Just because you have settled on being a low level employee your entire life doesn't give you the right to impose those views on others, so you can gain at your own low level existence.  I make zero dollars a year and have been lately been selling my plasma for extra spending money and living off my savings.  I do not want to put the burden of saving the weak of this country by forcing the strong to save them, because I will be one of the strong ones one day.  Giving up hope of a great future has unfortuanatley become the sickness of America. 
Hope:
everything will be okay in the end.
if it is not okay, then it is not the end.


lakia
"PC Partyman"

Posts : 3975
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 27, 2009

^^^And keep in mind the tax structure and government policies of Clinton put us in a surplus, while Bush put us in a record deficit. All the tax breaks the rich are getting now are not leading to trickle down. The are heavily taxed, yet have the US has the least in tax REVENUE because of all the loopholes givin' to the rich corporations. So, in reality, they aren't payin much in taxes. And it's FACT that the top 4% went from controlling 9& of the wealth to 22% of the wealth in the US over the last 8 years. That doesn't seem like trickle down... it's the gaddamn opposite.

 
I dont deny that clinton was a good domestic president, and i never have. But you cant deny that Reagan did pull us out of the shit hole that Carter and friends put our economy in, and it lasted through clinton as well. Economy is not isntantaneous.

Obama is not denying that the deregulations of the banks was appropriate. And in fact, Bush had mulitiple chances over the last 8 years to do something about it. It was a good idea to get some stuff rolling, but after the writing was on the wall, some regulations needed to be stamped down and they weren't. What do you think Obama is going to do?
 
Good question. I dont look at Obama as Jesus Christ Mother Mary and Josepsh Who art in heaven, i look at him as a presiden, a single man with power in a large government who might be the head of the government, but he is certainly not our savior. It disgusts me how he has turned into some pop culture figure and how they are pumping him up to the be the second coming of christ. We will see what he will do. And thats that.

Now Lakia, let me ask you this. If you bust your ass, and make a good living, what do you consider A LOT of money. Would 200,000 a year be a lot. Maybe 250,000? If you bust your ass, and make 250,000, you're not getting taxed any more than you are today! Now, if you are one of those rich CEOs that's making MILLIONS, I could see why you might get pissed. I mean for fucks sake, you've been raping your employees for 8 plus years now. Not giving them pay raises to match the cost of living, yet increase the cost of your product. You've been giving yourself muli million dollar bonuses and higher pay every year. And now, when the country is in the shitter, you're asked to do your part and pay some extra taxes... you'll still make millions, though. But that's just down right UNAMERICAN to think that you should help out your country.
 
Sure 200 - 250 grand a year would be alot. I sure as hell doubt you would call that just a smidgin of money. And thats who they want to tax more. Same with the fledgling middle class in this country.
 
It has nothing to do with not wanting to help out the country slimp. It has to do with understanding that THROWING MONEY AT THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE ANSWER! Plain and simple. Give a man a fish he'll eat for a day. Teach him to fish he'll feed himself for a life time. The wonderful celebration of mediocrity in this country has to stop. We are setting our children up for failure. And if you start giving more money to the poor just because they are poor and start taxing them less well why would they ever want to excel if they can get more money for doing less?! ITS GOING ON RIGHT NOW!

Pull your head out of your ass Lakia. YOU will NEVER make millions. YOU will NEVER make the amount of money that should make you concerned with Obama's tax structure.
 
Haha yeah well you never know. But im glad to know youve ruled it out for yourself. Just because you dotn believe you yourself can do it doesnt mean that i cant. Thats another topic though. Then again i dont know if i want to work the 22 hour days it takes to make millions. So maybe i wont. I bet if you could make millions writing your comics you'd love that, hell i'd love it if i could make millions doing civil engineering and architecture.
 
 
 
[quoteThe reason the US is in the situation we're in is because EVERYONE is greedy. From the CEOs to the small minimum wage earner in Spokane. Greed. Gotta have my cars, flat screens, guns, snowboards, etc... and if I can't pay for it today, I'll slap down the credit card and pay it later. And with all that false "wealth" plastic gave us, we completely ignored the fact that we were not truly gaining wealth. We were digging ourselves deeper in to holes. We ignored the fact that while our credit went up, our pays stayed the same and products went up. But we didn't car because we were still getting stuff... no buying, getting, because we all used credit.
 
This i dont disagree with one bit. How will taxing people more solve the fact that we are materialistic?

You know youre getting old when your ol lady says "honey lets run
up stairs and make love" and you say "sorry i cant do both!"
For True Since 1984


SpecialKallt...
"Intersting Jailbird"

Posts : 3572
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 27, 2009

the people have asked for help! how dare I say they should not get it!



Blank
Hope:
everything will be okay in the end.
if it is not okay, then it is not the end.


HATER_PLAYER
"In Your Face"

Posts : 8096
OFFLINE

Posted on Mar 02, 2009

^^^thanks for the bullshit irrelevant 911 call.
 
if you can't contribute to the discussion like an adult, maybe you should get put back in the kiddie forum where you belong?

slimp_dawg

Posts : 1821
ONLINE

Posted on Mar 02, 2009

Lakia... I didn't mean that you, or I won't make millions as an insult, and I doubt you took it as one. And yes, the possibility is always there. And considering what I do and who I work for, my possibility is probably higher than the average. However, I do live in reality, and reality is, I don't make millions. And no, middle class is NOT being taxed heavier under Obama. And those BUSINESSES AND EMPLOYEES only making 250 k and less are NOT being taxed higher in Obama's tax structure. AND Obama and this government isn't just "throwing" money at a problem. They're "spending" money to create jobs, stablilize markets, and get credit flowing again so that we can all have jobs, buy stuff and move out of this hole we're in... hopefully learning something from all this.

I'm not exactly sure where the idea that we're all gonna get taxed more now is coming from, nor do I get the idea that the democrats are just "throwing" money at the problem. Yet it was OK for Bush and the republicans to "throw" money at the Iraq war. Remember, Bush put us in a HUGE deficit fighting this war. Was all that money well spent? And let me ask this, was all the money beneficially to the "tax payer"?

Lakia, I know that you have a good thinking mind. You gotta be able to look through this stimulus spending and see that pumping money in to projects that help employ blue collar, middle class America as being a good thing. You gotta be able to see the facts that the last 8 years of trickle down economics failed, and that deregulation put us in a hole. So... what's the answer. More de-regulation and more trickle down? Time and place for all views. This is the time and place for more regulations, and more "trickle UP" economics.

I draw all my own stunts


davesc2

Posts : 102
ONLINE

Posted on Mar 03, 2009

Some idiot on the ron reagan show yesterday was whining that the vast majority of the people in this country won't become one of these high-paid execs and that's a problem.  How is that a problem?  Why are these high-paid execs to blame for others people's lack of ambition, drive, intelligence?  I happen to know one of these high-paid execs, a former ceo in fact, and he's a great guy.  And I've met a lot of his friends who also happen to be high-paid execs, and they're all good people with great families.  So when people sit there and say that these high-paid execs are to blame for someone else's lack of abilities, and that they should be punished for it....it makes me crazy.  
Fine asshole, you want to whine about high-paid execs.....?  Go do all the work necessary to graduate #1 from harvard law.  Have your family make all the sacrifices necessary to make sure you have every opportunity you need to graduate #1 from your public high school, and your 2 brothers as well.  Get all that done and then you can whine about what he has and you don't. 
 
Why do libs insist on tearing down instead of building up?  Why can't they figure out how to get people to get themselves out of the cabrini greens of this country?  Because they don't want to....they need people to  make victims out of.  They need people to feel left out, put down, held back so they can tell these people who is to blame for their plight and how to get back at them.
 
The liberal pols in this country are pathetic class-war mongers who couldn't get voted in on principals because they have none.
Pain heals, chicks dig scars, glory lasts forever
If someone asks you if you're a god, you say YES!!!


slimp_dawg

Posts : 1821
ONLINE

Posted on Mar 03, 2009

Question Davesc2... if libs are the ones "tearing" down, why is it the county is in a huge shit hole right now?

High paid execs are not the problem, and those who think they should be punished just for making money are not thinking clearly. However, since a large sum of money is being re-allocating from the middle class to the upper 4%, it would be nice if they all banded together and said, shit man, I'll pay a little more in taxes so that the economy can get a pick me up. I'll still be making a ton, and I can scale back a little, much like the rest of the population has had to do. Now, the execs who clearly did some shady shit, those are the ones needing to be punished. Like the fuckheads that falsified loan applications to give higher loans to people who never should have qualified.

The real problem with this country is not the high paid execs, or the corporations. It's the people who LOVE to point out the faults of the "other" party, rather than banding together as a society and making it work together. There's a real divide right now, and it's a shame that republicans are HOPING for the failure of the President. Wouldn't that mean we fail as a country. Instead of being so close minded, why not hold out some hope that our current President can help and let's all do what we can to support him. Disagreeing with him is one thing, hoping for failure is another.

I draw all my own stunts


davesc2

Posts : 102
ONLINE

Posted on Mar 05, 2009

Posted by slimp_dawg
Question Davesc2... if libs are the ones "tearing" down, why is it the county is in a huge shit hole right now?

because they've been promising to raise up whatever minority was feeling victimized and punishing those responsible....and yet not much has changed since fdr.  the rich get richer, the poor victims they've promised to raise up are still in the same position and yet the victims keep falling for what the libs are selling them.  who is really victimizing whom?

High paid execs are not the problem, and those who think they should be punished just for making money are not thinking clearly. However, since a large sum of money is being re-allocating from the middle class to the upper 4%, it would be nice if they all banded together and said, shit man, I'll pay a little more in taxes so that the economy can get a pick me up. I'll still be making a ton, and I can scale back a little, much like the rest of the population has had to do. Now, the execs who clearly did some shady shit, those are the ones needing to be punished. Like the fuckheads that falsified loan applications to give higher loans to people who never should have qualified.
 
who falsified loan applications?  clinton started the program to allow under-qualified people to get mortgages, bush didn't get rid of it.  and here we are.  fannie mae and freddie mac were started by clinton back in '98.
 

The real problem with this country is not the high paid execs, or the corporations. It's the people who LOVE to point out the faults of the "other" party, rather than banding together as a society and making it work together.
 
and you've never said anything bad about bush?
 
 There's a real divide right now, and it's a shame that republicans are HOPING for the failure of the President. Wouldn't that mean we fail as a country. Instead of being so close minded, why not hold out some hope that our current President can help and let's all do what we can to support him. Disagreeing with him is one thing, hoping for failure is another.
 
do i want the country to fail?  no.  do i think obama's policies can bring that about? yes.  therefore I hope his policies fail.  much like i hope the st louis cardinals fail and the green bay packers fail. 
Pain heals, chicks dig scars, glory lasts forever
If someone asks you if you're a god, you say YES!!!


slimp_dawg

Posts : 1821
ONLINE

Posted on Mar 05, 2009

I am curious how you feel Obama's policies will fail? Or are you just saying they're going to fail because you feel that way.

I don't disagree that falsified loan applications weren't a part in this whole thing. But again, you place all the blame on the execs (and I am in no way letting their shady actions off the hook), without holding those who took the loans responsible. That's bullshit. If you make 40k a year, and get approved for a 500k house, can't you do the math in your own fucking head and figure it out... YOU CAN'T AFFORD IT! Just because you got approved doesn't mean you should take the entire amount. That goes for credit cards as well. And over the last 30 years, America has dug itself as a society deeper and deeper in to debt. The execs have gotten greedier and greedier, the consumer has gotten greedier and greedier, and it's all be plastic money and no real wealth.

And yes, I have disagreed with a lot of Bush's policies and pointed that out... here's the kicker, my disapproval of his policies are justified in the current state of life in the US. We're fucked. Obama didn't do this to us and is trying like hell to get us out. If in 4 years we're just as fucked, or no better off, then I'd say his policies didn't work. But I'm not going to rag on him after two months when this shitstorm we're in is gonna continue for a while and he had very little to do with it. AND, as it just so happens, I do agree with many of his policies. Let's just hope that the republicans in congress will actually allow some of those policies to take hold.

I draw all my own stunts


HATER_PLAYER
"In Your Face"

Posts : 8096
OFFLINE

Posted on Mar 05, 2009

How can you Reaganite Republican types debate giving money to an organization that actually has an actual product, (good or bad), employs lots of regular ' joe six packs' with no fancy tax lawyers or CA's who actually pay the taxes they own (prior finance/bank tax defferals worth millions/billions, etc.etc) and spend time hammering them?
 
"Let them fail!" but when (insert ex-major financial organization here) bellies up to the bar and wants another (insert very large billion type number here) to pay for the mistakes of traders who make on average (insert larger bonus number here) you can't rush fast enough to save them and the 'new economy' jobs they all created for us.
 
If you take the the aggregate tax rates and actual taxes paid by the various employees and corporations getting these bail out dollars, you can see who really pays the way for these 'fat cat' types bitching to ditch the automotive industry. Yeah, they want you to ditch them... How much more money can they make breaking them up and repacking them in to various 'guaranteed return' portfolios to sell to the unwitting (oh wait am I describing the currect Wall Street mortgage mess?).
 
Bottom line: money to others for bail outs leaves less money for them. It really is dog eat dog world and if a dollar is to be separated from a sucker, who do you bet on 'the financial experts' or a poor 'joe six pack'? Trickle down theory really is warm and yellow for those not taking home an annual performance bounus tham most ' joe six packs' could retire on.

[Edited by HATER_PLAYER on 3/5/2009 at 9:20 AM]

slimp_dawg

Posts : 1821
ONLINE

Posted on Mar 05, 2009

^^^HP... I have NO idea what you just said!

I just am very curious as to WHAT exactly is so bad with Obama's policies. Sure, there is probably some spending that doesn't "need" to happen. But a lot of the spending will result in jobs directly and indirectly. And that seems better than spending a lot of money in military funding to support a war that was mis-managed from the beginning. Then sending tons of dough to rebuild a country we fucked up.

I think a lot of people base their politics on something, then stick with that idea no matter what. Like "de-regulating". Some people believe that free market and de-regulating is the way to go, and will align themselves with politicians that feel the same way. They don't take in to considerations the current state of the economy, or foreign relations or shit like that, they just stick with that idea. But in reality, there's a time and place for some policies. Blame Clinton all you want with the start of loans to lower income... but it was s time and place, and it got some stuff moving. Then what needs to happen is it needs to be watched and when the writing is on the wall, regulations need to be slapped down to prevent a crisis. That didn't happen. Same goes for the trading of oil futures, the auto industry, Wall Street, etc...

So, instead of blindly aligning yourself with a party and it's ideals, look at what is currently going on, and try to think what is the best situation and policy for what is going on. Right now, we have a lot of unemployment. How do we counter act that? Job creation. How do we create jobs... well, building shit might be one way. And when Joe Plumber has a job, he buys shit... which employs the retail world... Then retail dude buys a house (the can afford), which employs Joe Contractor... and Joe Contractor buys a new car... and so on and so on.
I draw all my own stunts


davesc2

Posts : 102
ONLINE

Posted on Mar 06, 2009

Posted by slimp_dawg
I am curious how you feel Obama's policies will fail? Or are you just saying they're going to fail because you feel that way.

I never said his policies would fail.  I just feel that his policies are creating not just big gov't but huge gov't.  That is bad.  too many laws/rules/regulations are just as bad as not enough.  we need to find that happy medium....let me know if anyone ever finds it   lol

I don't disagree that falsified loan applications weren't a part in this whole thing.
who falsified loan applications?  
 
 But again, you place all the blame on the execs (and I am in no way letting their shady actions off the hook), without holding those who took the loans responsible.
um no I'm not.  the blame sits mainly with those who didn't do their homework and applied for mortgages they had no hope of affording and those who preyed on them. 
 
That's bullshit. If you make 40k a year, and get approved for a 500k house, can't you do the math in your own fucking head and figure it out... YOU CAN'T AFFORD IT! Just because you got approved doesn't mean you should take the entire amount. That goes for credit cards as well. And over the last 30 years, America has dug itself as a society deeper and deeper in to debt. The execs have gotten greedier and greedier, the consumer has gotten greedier and greedier, and it's all be plastic money and no real wealth.
amen hallelujah!  someone gets it!

And yes, I have disagreed with a lot of Bush's policies and pointed that out... here's the kicker, my disapproval of his policies are justified in the current state of life in the US. We're fucked. Obama didn't do this to us and is trying like hell to get us out. If in 4 years we're just as fucked, or no better off, then I'd say his policies didn't work. But I'm not going to rag on him after two months when this shitstorm we're in is gonna continue for a while and he had very little to do with it. AND, as it just so happens, I do agree with many of his policies. Let's just hope that the republicans in congress will actually allow some of those policies to take hold.

 
and what can the republicans in congress do?  vote against something and hope someone listens?  the republicans may as well throw spitballs at the sun for all they'll be able to do. 
 
here are the basics....obama's policies would create bigger gov't.  I don't want bigger gov't, I think bigger gov't would be bad for us.  so i hope he fails to bring about bigger gov't.  how about he fixes the banks, gets those monstrosities under control (yes, I think more regulation is needed....always have wanted more banking regulations.  I want very strict rules about what they can and can't do with my money).
 
fannie mae and freddie mac were started under clinton.  clinton is the one who started the non-sense with unqualified people being able to get mortgages.  that didn't really catch up to us until the past year or two.  and yes, americans, in general, seem to be absolutely in love with living way beyond their means.  I don't.  I have a line of credit for use in emergencies.....I or someone close has a medical emergency and I need money right now for example.  but not so I can run out to best buy and get a 10-ft plasma for my bathroom or something else stupid.  those are the morons that are screaming right now.  I may actually lose that line of credit because of those idiots.  although all the foreclosures are making it easier for me to be able to become a first-time home buyer, however.  no mortgage, though.....straight up cash!  perhaps phoenix.....hmmm
 
 
 
Pain heals, chicks dig scars, glory lasts forever
If someone asks you if you're a god, you say YES!!!


hall3p11

Posts : 198
ONLINE

Posted on Mar 14, 2009

I saw a figure on C-span the other day.  Obama's already spent more then Bush, and we're still in the first few months.  Can his policies fail?  Sure.  I can ail at typing too.  Everything has a chance to fail, that's why lifetime warrenties are good for the life of the product, when it fails, it's product life is over.  Pretty sneaky, eh?
How will Obama's policies fail?  Hard to say since his stimulus plan isn't supposed to take effect (realy) for 2 years, so we wont be able to tell if his first big spending as President did any good until he's no longer president.  Have his policies failed?  I do remember his saying somthing about kicking lobyists, no earmarks and all that crap...  but he's already signed off on bills with lots of pork in them.  Millions of dollars to clean the air around Iowa pig farms?!?!  Farms are supposed to smell, if it doesn't, then it's not a farm.

Question, if the president doesnt sign a bill after it passes through congress, vetos it or whatever, what then?  Redraft the whole thing?  Congress over rules the president?  If he gets a bill on his desk he doesn't like due to excessive spending, or the wrong earmarks in it (gotta give money back to Chicago after all) couldn't he just throw it out, tell them to try again?  After a few weeks of rejected proposals, you would think the House and Senate would draft what he wants, not what they want.  Anyone know how that really works?


26-42 of 42 posts
Previous 1 2

Problems, Comments, Suggestions

About |  Advertise |  Jobs |  Community Index |  Email |  FAQ |  Terms
Copyright ©2004 Colonies.com