Related Communities :  Central |  Ski |  Skateboard |  Snowmobile |  Mountain Bike |  Surf |  Wakeboard |  More...

Skip Navigation
You are viewing this website with either CSS support turned off, or are not using a CSS compliant browser. This will significantly reduce your Colonies.com experience.

 Advertisement Advertise With Us

Snowboard.com Forums

Search only in this forum

The Brits want their guns back!

Recieve Email Updates.
Verify your email to receive email notifications.
1-25 of 29 posts
1 2 Next
SpecialKallt...
"Intersting Jailbird"

Posts : 3572
ONLINE

Posted on Jan 22, 2009


Hope:
everything will be okay in the end.
if it is not okay, then it is not the end.


davesc2

Posts : 102
ONLINE

Posted on Jan 23, 2009

Gee, big surprise.  You take guns out of the hands of citizens and crime rises dramatically. 
 
Ok, gun banners I'm curious......what are you really trying to accomplish by taking guns away from gun owners?  What effect are gun bans supposed to have on society as a whole?  And how are gun bans supposed to stop violent crime?  And what would happen if our government turned on us (highly unlikely, but still a possibility that has to be considered).
Pain heals, chicks dig scars, glory lasts forever
If someone asks you if you're a god, you say YES!!!


paolosmythe
"Unemployed sulker"

Posts : 7120
ONLINE

Posted on Jan 29, 2009

Posted by davesc2
Gee, big surprise.  You take guns out of the hands of citizens and crime rises dramatically. 
 
crime rises anyway.  you look at america; a nation with guns.  by your above situation, the USA is a peace filled utopia.
 
Ok, gun banners I'm curious......what are you really trying to accomplish by taking guns away from gun owners?
 
i thought that was quite obvious.  next...
 
  What effect are gun bans supposed to have on society as a whole?
 
see previous question.  you do not pay any attention eh?
 
 
And how are gun bans supposed to stop violent crime?
 
they are not.  but are you suggesting that gun ownership would?
 
the crime stats of gun owning nations would beg to differ.
 
  And what would happen if our government turned on us
 
a gov turning on a population with guns - it could do what it wanted.  the gov will always determine what guns the people have and will ensure it has bigger guns.
 
a population without guns - wouldn't need so many guns to enforce its preferences, coz the populace would be less armed than them already.
 
doubt me.... consider death by cop statistics.  higher rates are indicative of law enforcement officers exercises a due process of conduct that anticipates armed felons.  UK coppers don;t have guns, coz they have no presumption that those needing to be arrested are armed.  net result - fewer deaths.
 
this is not so overly complex for even a gun owner to understand!
STICK OPPOSITION MOVEMENT
If you want to act 'serious',
then become a skier!


SpecialKallt...
"Intersting Jailbird"

Posts : 3572
ONLINE

Posted on Jan 29, 2009

Posted by paolosmythe 
crime rises anyway.  you look at america; a nation with guns.  by your above situation, the USA is a peace filled utopia.
 
you are assuming all of the US has the same gun laws.  This is not true.  The areas with the higher crime rates have very restrictive gun laws, some that make it next to impossible to even own a gun.  I live in an example of a peaceful town that I am on a daily basis am allow to carry my gun with me.  While on the other hand when I visit my girl in New Jersy, an area with a much much high crime rate, I am not even allowed to bring my gun into the state let alone carry it.
 
i thought that was quite obvious.  next...
 
 
 
see previous question.  you do not pay any attention eh?
 
for those of us that are a little slow, could you spell it out for us.
 
 
they are not.  but are you suggesting that gun ownership would?
 
the crime stats of gun owning nations would beg to differ.
 
you are saying that having guns doesn't lower crime?  Well then how does it raise it then?  You have to not think in your small unarmed countries mind set to realize that there are already guns everywhere in the US.  "let's just ban all guns" is easy to say, but how is that actually going to work?  If guns were deemed illegal I wouldn't turn mine in and I'm doubting many others would as well.  
 
a gov turning on a population with guns - it could do what it wanted.  the gov will always determine what guns the people have and will ensure it has bigger guns.
 
a population without guns - wouldn't need so many guns to enforce its preferences, coz the populace would be less armed than them already.
 
So you say having more and bigger guns makes you the victor.  Well let me call up the guys in Iraq right now and let them know that cause the US has many more  and much bigger weapons than the people they are fighting.  The war should be over tomorrow then.
 
doubt me.... consider death by cop statistics.  higher rates are indicative of law enforcement officers exercises a due process of conduct that anticipates armed felons.  UK coppers don;t have guns, coz they have no presumption that those needing to be arrested are armed.  net result - fewer deaths.
 
this is not so overly complex for even a gun owner to understand!
 
In 2006 about 200 people were killed in arrest related deaths in the US, this doesn't not say how many were killed by gun shot though.  I couldn't find how many in GB were killed by cops, so can't say if this is more I am figuring it is though.  The US has about 305,708,407 people, while the UK has about 60,943,912, so how many people are killed by cops a year in the UK??  Is the ratio close?  200 out of 300 million, sounds fair to me.  That includes those that died in car crashes from high speed chases, beating them to death and other accidents.

42000 people die each year in the US from car crashes, lets ban cars since they cause death.  Seeing as the point here is to keep as many people alive as possible.  

Hope:
everything will be okay in the end.
if it is not okay, then it is not the end.


SpecialKallt...
"Intersting Jailbird"

Posts : 3572
ONLINE

Posted on Jan 30, 2009

why arm civilians when cops have guns already? Mumbai
Hope:
everything will be okay in the end.
if it is not okay, then it is not the end.


lakia
"PC Partyman"

Posts : 3953
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 01, 2009

Posted by davesc2
Gee, big surprise.  You take guns out of the hands of citizens and crime rises dramatically. 
 
Ok, gun banners I'm curious......what are you really trying to accomplish by taking guns away from gun owners?  What effect are gun bans supposed to have on society as a whole?  And how are gun bans supposed to stop violent crime?  And what would happen if our government turned on us (highly unlikely, but still a possibility that has to be considered).
 
to drop crime rates, and violent crimes especially with guns.......because we all know criminals are law abiding citizens. im sure they'll follow the gun ban............
You know youre getting old when your ol lady says "honey lets run
up stairs and make love" and you say "sorry i cant do both!"
For True Since 1984


paolosmythe
"Unemployed sulker"

Posts : 7120
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 03, 2009

Posted by SpecialKalltheway
you are assuming all of the US has the same gun laws.  This is not true.  The areas with the higher crime rates have very restrictive gun laws, some that make it next to impossible to even own a gun.  I live in an example of a peaceful town that I am on a daily basis am allow to carry my gun with me.  While on the other hand when I visit my girl in New Jersy, an area with a much much high crime rate, I am not even allowed to bring my gun into the state let alone carry it.
 
but you are assuming that those naughty people who would wish to acquire illegal weapons would remain within their neighbourhoods when getting them.
 
those living in 'peaceful towns' would no doubt provide 'easy pickings' for those used to a more restrictive environment.
 
for those of us that are a little slow, could you spell it out for us.
 
fewer legal guns = fewer guns available to be stolen = fewer illegal guns = fewer death / injury due to illegal guns
 
 
you are saying that having guns doesn't lower crime?  Well then how does it raise it then?
 
see previous reply.
 
You have to not think in your small unarmed countries mind set to realize that there are already guns everywhere in the US.  "let's just ban all guns" is easy to say, but how is that actually going to work?  If guns were deemed illegal I wouldn't turn mine in and I'm doubting many others would as well.  
 
how wonderfully racist and dismissive of you.  i come from the UK and thus can only appreciate things on the basis of being from the UK?  unlike most americans, i travel this planet.
 
you might consider the concept of a gun ban to be impossible; but i think it is far more likely to be realised than asking all gun owners to never use them unless absolutely necessary.  or to ensure that such things do not end up in the hands of bad lads.  proof for this, lies in your nation's statistics when compared to the rest of the world.
 
cue your suggesting that a gun ban would make criminals of otherwise law abiding citizens / all illegal guns are smuggled into the country.......
 
So you say having more and bigger guns makes you the victor.
 
that is not what i am saying.  but those who own a firearm on the basis of personal and / or home protection most certainly do!
 
42000 people die each year in the US from car crashes, lets ban cars since they cause death.  Seeing as the point here is to keep as many people alive as possible.
 
the primary use of a motor vehicle is not to threaten death or injury on another person. 
if such an effort was made, then the driver would be arrested. 
meanwhile, the purpose of a firearm is precisely that. 
this little tit bit of fact is what renders your comparison facetious.
 
meanwhile your death by cop per capita investigation is of significance for why?

[Edited by paolosmythe on 03/02/2009 at 03:56]
STICK OPPOSITION MOVEMENT
If you want to act 'serious',
then become a skier!


SpecialKallt...
"Intersting Jailbird"

Posts : 3572
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 03, 2009

Posted by paolosmythe
 
but you are assuming that those naughty people who would wish to acquire illegal weapons would remain within their neighbourhoods when getting them.
 
those living in 'peaceful towns' would no doubt provide 'easy pickings' for those used to a more restrictive environment.
 
I never assumed that the naughty people don't transverse boarders to get weapons.  A vast majority of the illegal guns on the streets of New Jersey come from other states.  The states decide the gun laws of this country so each state is different.
 
you must have miss read my friend.  New Jersey is the more restrictive and more 'non-peaceful town' and Colorado is the less restrictive and more 'peaceful area.'  You take someone who thinks he is hard out of New Jersey and plop him in Colorado and he would get his ass handed to him.
 
fewer legal guns = fewer guns available to be stolen = fewer illegal guns = fewer death / injury due to illegal guns
 
there is no way of telling how many guns are in the US the popular number to throw around is 200 million, which a lot say is grossly underestimated.  So, we ban guns, half of those get turned in then only 100 million illegal guns exist.  The cops and everyone else die by the hands of these illegal guns until they are all discovered then we live in a utopia?
 
if all guns were legal then there would be 0 deaths by "illegal guns" only deaths by illegal actions.  To kill someone you need to know how to use your weapon of choice, doesn't matter if that is a gun, a knife, a baseball bat or a cricket bat.
 
it is possible for two people to stand 10 feet apart and empty both their guns and not land a single round on each other.
 
 
you are saying that having guns doesn't lower crime?  Well then how does it raise it then?
 
see previous reply.
 
oh right your previous reply has the great plan of banning all guns, but no details of how that should be done.  While we are at it lets cure cancer cause that's a pretty popular plan as well.  It also had no hard facts that guns raise crime either.
 
how wonderfully racist and dismissive of you.  i come from the UK and thus can only appreciate things on the basis of being from the UK?  unlike most americans, i travel this planet.
 
I've only been to 33 countries so far, so I haven't traveled the much of the planet yet, but I'm working on it.  Having lived in 3 different countries is like I have is a little different than having spent a few weeks in one though.  being a world traveler does not make you and expert on the world.  It does however give you different perspectives.  Obviously where I have gone(and lived) and you have gone gave you and I different perspectives.
 
you might consider the concept of a gun ban to be impossible; but i think it is far more likely to be realized than asking all gun owners to never use them unless absolutely necessary.  or to ensure that such things do not end up in the hands of bad lads.  proof for this, lies in your nation's statistics when compared to the rest of the world.
 
cue your suggesting that a gun ban would make criminals of otherwise law abiding citizens / all illegal guns are smuggled into the country.......
 
I wasn't suggesting we ask them nicely to not use their weapons in a malicious manner or for illegal purposes.  I am all for locking someone up for 5 to 10 years just for threatening someone with a firearm
that is not what i am saying.  but those who own a firearm on the basis of personal and / or home protection most certainly do!
 
I own my guns for these 4 reasons in this order
1)recreation
2)hunting
3)self protection(I figure hey I already have them, so if I have to I can use them.)
4)stopping the US gov't or any other gov't from taking the country by force.
 
the first two are the real reason I like having them, the last two are just cause I already happen to have them.
 
 
the primary use of a motor vehicle is not to threaten death or injury on another person. 
if such an effort was made, then the driver would be arrested. 
meanwhile, the purpose of a firearm is precisely that. 
this little tit bit of fact is what renders your comparison facetious.
 
the primary use of a gun is not to threaten death or injury on another person.  Here lays our main problem, your warped sense of what a gun is, is also shared by some sick individuals that would actually use it in this way.  Education and helping people realize how to be responsible would be a better solution than demonizing guns.  
 
meanwhile your death by cop per capita investigation is of significance for why?
it was in response about something you said about gun deaths and cops, I'm to lazy to go back a reread the context it was in right now.
 
This anti-gun agenda you push is based on this one idea that people shouldn't die just so other people can enjoy themselves.  Screw all the people that treat their guns with respect and do not use them in heinous ways because they don't matter.  Then you throw out my comparison to the automobile because its primary mode is transportation.  So, as long as it gets you form point A to point B then it is excusable for many to die so others can have the convenience of easier travel.  We could to safe modes of transportation, but screw all those people that are dying we like to get there fast! 
 
How about skydiving, many people do that each year and survive and say it's a grand old time, but sometimes people die.  Well it doesn't serve any purpose besides entertainment though.  So we should ban that cause people die doing it every one and a while.
 
If you are so quick to stomp on the rights of law abiding citizens then where do you go next after guns?  You going to go on a full out war against kitchen knives.  people are killed every year by a common house hold kitchen knife.  No more cooking at home, because some people use those knives improperly!!!!!!

Ok so people love cooking to much so we'll never get rid of that, plus they gotta eat too.
 
Let's get rid of any and all martial arts training, they use weapons and they also learn how to hurt people.  There is no reason to take martial arts besides learning how to cause death or harm of another person.  Sure, there are way more people that do it for recreation and to keep in shape than those that use it for illegal purposes, but fuck those people.  We can't have anyone doing it!

[Edited by SpecialKalltheway on 2/3/2009 at 10:42 AM]
Hope:
everything will be okay in the end.
if it is not okay, then it is not the end.


lakia
"PC Partyman"

Posts : 3953
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 05, 2009

specialk you will never win this one. ive danced this dance a hundred times. and paolo hates guns. there is never a reason to hand them. and he thinks a gun ban will solve the problem. for some reason everyone who thinks a gun ban will work also thinks criminals follow the law and a ban would make them unattainable
You know youre getting old when your ol lady says "honey lets run
up stairs and make love" and you say "sorry i cant do both!"
For True Since 1984


SpecialKallt...
"Intersting Jailbird"

Posts : 3572
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 05, 2009

If I won then the argument would be over and then what would I do to entertain myself?  I'm not worried about him blindly hating guns, he doesn't live in the same area as I do.  I just look at this as great practice for dealing with anit-gun nuts that have a vote where I live.
 
He also lives in a very different place than the US.  I have argued with him using the US standard.  If I truely wanted to argue for guns effectively I would use his regions culture, laws and rights, but I don't care if GB has guns or not.  When I argue with people from Canada I have to argue differently as well, cause that's a whole other bag.  The gun laws in Canada are completely different and they also do not have the abundence of guns that the US has, also it is not a right to own guns there or in GB like it is in the US.
Hope:
everything will be okay in the end.
if it is not okay, then it is not the end.


Aras_Tamoliunas

Posts : 1369
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 05, 2009

this issue of gun control has been argued really well. I mean ultimately I think SpecialK wins in all fairness to mr. Paulo. That being said I am totally pro-guns coming from Idaho.

But ultimately I think one's environment growing up which is comprised of parents, neighborhood, social experience, etc has a heavy impact on one's position on this issue as I am sure it does on a lot of other issues. I've grown up with guns all of my life and right now down the hall from me are kids who have grown up in NYC and have never touched a gun. Our perspectives are vastly different. Even after reviewing the facts and making logical arguments, people tend to be pretty biased in one direction or another.

But for fuck's sake, if I were to make an argument for gun control, I would argue that guns should be sequestered because in a hostile situation such as two guys ready to throw down, the presence of a firearm could be lethal. It's pretty easy to fly off the handle and if someone wasn't thinking, pulled out their gun, and shot, they could kill someone. Or even if they didn't intend to kill anyone, but just use it as a show of force...it's lethal. Yet, a counterargument is that most people know that guns kill and so don't bring them out in heated confrontation. Furthermore, alcohol causes many many deaths and certainly tons of pain. People abuse it all the time. Yet we allow people to consume it. Why shouldn't people be able to own guns.


lakia
"PC Partyman"

Posts : 3953
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 07, 2009

Posted by Aras_Tamoliunas

But for fuck's sake, if I were to make an argument for gun control, I would argue that guns should be sequestered because in a hostile situation such as two guys ready to throw down, the presence of a firearm could be lethal. It's pretty easy to fly off the handle and if someone wasn't thinking, pulled out their gun, and shot, they could kill someone. Or even if they didn't intend to kill anyone, but just use it as a show of force...it's lethal. Yet, a counterargument is that most people know that guns kill and so don't bring them out in heated confrontation. Furthermore, alcohol causes many many deaths and certainly tons of pain. People abuse it all the time. Yet we allow people to consume it. Why shouldn't people be able to own guns.

 
if your arguement for gun control comes from 2 people ready to throw down and then one of them pulls a gun cause their pissed on the unarmed man, what part of idaho are you from my friend? Where i come from. spokane/mead washington, when we throw down we throw fists. We dont pull guns. Sometimes you get your ass beat. Sometimes you win. My family is from western montana and twin falls/gooding/boise idaho, you dont pull guns, if you call someone out you throw fists. Weapons are for pussies unless its war or you yourself are threatened with a weapon.
 
Just because some pricks from california or new york are scared of guns doesnt mean that two people getting into it is a good reason arguement for gun control. Just my opinion man. Long story short....dont be a bitch and if you call someone out, be ready to get your ass beat, or win. It goes either way. I deal with it 4 nights a week.
You know youre getting old when your ol lady says "honey lets run
up stairs and make love" and you say "sorry i cant do both!"
For True Since 1984


Aras_Tamoliunas

Posts : 1369
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 07, 2009

Well  that was a hypothetical situation. I have never seen anyone take out a gun from a heated discussion except once and that kid is now in jail. Fists are the weapon of choice. But I am sure it happens where someone loses their cool and takes out their gun. Doesn't it seem plausible? I don't know, I am trying to be devil's advocate here...maybe wrong reasoning.

lakia
"PC Partyman"

Posts : 3953
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 07, 2009

my only point was that its a pussies way out. nothing against you what so ever. I know what youre playing at. You take the gangs/thugs. If they dont have 5 vs 1 they pull guns or knives. No matter what though, people will always find a weapon to use, be it a knife, a gun, a cue ball, a pool stick, a broken bottle, ect ect if they arent big enough to go hand to hand.
 
Most people who havent grown up around guns or havent been taught how to use them are either A)scared shitless of them and have never shot one or maybe been around a gun once, or B) go out and buy one and think it makes them a tough guy. Its like the idiot who goes in and buys a Desert Eagle. Small dick syndrom and probably doesnt know alot about side arms/guns in general.
 
Long story short. Criminals dont get their name for following the law. I dont see why that doesnt make sense to anyone.
You know youre getting old when your ol lady says "honey lets run
up stairs and make love" and you say "sorry i cant do both!"
For True Since 1984


dewhitewolf27

Posts : 134
OFFLINE

Posted on Feb 20, 2009

You're right there, Lakia.  People who've never touched a gun are so afraid that guns will spontaneously discharge.  Then they condemn those of us who own guns.  We are to blame for the existence of street gangs to drug cartels to organized crime families. 
 
It is clear that PauloSmythe once again leads the charge against us in our decision to own firearms.  Why?  He believes that if government takes them away from us, criminals won't have them either.  Yet somehow guns make their way into the gun-free utopia countries like the UK, Japan, and even Mexico.
 
Pointing out statistics to folks like Paulo is a waste of time and effort.  So is pointing out that Switzerland and Finnland have lawful private ownership of guns, yet are not associated with being violent societies.  I have even gone so far as to point out that states that allow citizens to carry and protect themselves enjoy lower crime rates than those that do not.  Compare Florida (gun friendly) to New Jersey (gun hostile).  Which state has higher crime and violence?  That would be New Jersey.  Compare Indiana (gun friendly) with Illinois (gun hostile).  Again, the state with higher rates of crime and violence is Illinois.  Why do you think that is?  Possibly because in the gun hostile states the criminals know that there is a reduced chance of encountering armed victims, whereas in the gun friendly states, the criminals might think twice?
 
Nevertheless, Paulo would never be persuaded.  He is too attached to his views on the subject that no amount of evidence to the contrary would encourage him to see the other way. 
 
I believe it was Nietzsche who said "convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."

m60g

Posts : 10
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 25, 2009

Gun Cat SEEZ!  I like guns






Photobucket

Photobucket




[Edited by m60g on 2/25/2009 at 10:01 PM]

lakia
"PC Partyman"

Posts : 3953
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 26, 2009

oooooooo......an m-4? m-16? Or perhaps you spent the big money and purchased the new HK 6.8?
You know youre getting old when your ol lady says "honey lets run
up stairs and make love" and you say "sorry i cant do both!"
For True Since 1984


paolosmythe
"Unemployed sulker"

Posts : 7120
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 26, 2009

Posted by lakia
specialk you will never win this one. ive danced this dance a hundred times. and paolo hates guns. there is never a reason to hand them. and he thinks a gun ban will solve the problem. for some reason everyone who thinks a gun ban will work also thinks criminals follow the law and a ban would make them unattainable

 

The basis to my point of view is not from a hate of guns. They have their uses. Nor do I think that criminals will be immediately inclined to obey a new law.

 

Point is, most illegally owned guns are stolen from legal owners; thus the legal owner is the source of the end threat. It is not their fault per se, but there is a cause and effect. If like in the UK firearms are stored securely and remote from their ammunition, then it could be said that such a threat is undermined / cancelled out. I have less a problem with this management.

 

Of course bad lads will forever be bad, but that is not an excuse for good people to be dismissive of the responsibilities they allege to adhere to, thereby making them good. It is like a bar tender selling booze to an already drunk person who knows they are a repeat DUI offender.

Posted by lakia

my only point was that its a pussies way out. nothing against you what so ever. I know what youre playing at. You take the gangs/thugs. If they dont have 5 vs 1 they pull guns or knives. No matter what though, people will always find a weapon to use, be it a knife, a gun, a cue ball, a pool stick, a broken bottle, ect ect if they arent big enough to go hand to hand.

 

And this is a significant problem. In ALL of the pro-gun arguments, the basis is formed from that person's own behaviour and attitude. This is a problem on two fronts…. As with things such as driving, everybody presumes that they are 'the best whatever since forever' and that everyone else sucks balls in comparison. But also, such a mental fails to appreciate that even if this was accurate, many people abuse their 'right' to own a gun, by using it illegally or managing it irresponsibily.

Posted by Aras_Tamoliunas
But ultimately I think one's environment growing up which is comprised of parents, neighborhood, social experience, etc has a heavy impact on one's position on this issue as I am sure it does on a lot of other issues. I've grown up with guns all of my life and right now down the hall from me are kids who have grown up in NYC and have never touched a gun. Our perspectives are vastly different. Even after reviewing the facts and making logical arguments, people tend to be pretty biased in one direction or another.

 

I think it is safe to say that my attitude is of course biased by my upbringing and environment. The UK is 'gun free', but not as much as it once was. Perhaps this is reflective of the access and therefore scaremongering of modern news media, looking for 24 hour, hysterical content? But the increase in gun related activity is not being presented as a positive nor beneficial thing. This is of course a bias. Nothing sells like bad news.

 

But when the chance comes to discuss the 'pros and cons' of gun ownership, the reasons 'for' them are so short of compelling that they are almost selfundermining. And that is what I am left to conclude from.

Posted by dewhitewolf27

Nevertheless, Paulo would never be persuaded. He is too attached to his views on the subject that no amount of evidence to the contrary would encourage him to see the other way.

I believe it was Nietzsche who said "convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."

 

Mr dewolf….. Your cherry picking fails to impress. And your quoting my favourite philosopher will only antagonise me (as well you know. Thank you).

I understand your argument regarding the proliferation of crime in gun friendly / gun hostile regions, but the dividing lines between each are porous and thus not exclusive. As such, they are not fit for comparison. Basically your observation is 'loaded' and fails to endorse your perspective. If your argument was so obvious and compelling you'd not have to stoop to such ineffectual 'tricks'.

Point to note…. I will be moving to Canada soon. A nation with guns, illegally and legally owned. Will I be looking to gain a firearms permit……? When I lived in SoCal (a region with guns, illegally and legally owned) I did.
 
You see despite what yo might like to think of me, i am not blind to your arguement.  nor am i inclined to become a victim when i might easily restore a 'balance of power'.  but i am also accutely aware of the consequence of our decisions and how quickly things might turn from bad to worse.
 
i can and do appreciate the beneficial attributes of gun ownership.  but this does not stop me from being profoundly suspicious, of the brains of those people who (for eg) post fotos of their guns on teh interwebz....
STICK OPPOSITION MOVEMENT
If you want to act 'serious',
then become a skier!


lakia
"PC Partyman"

Posts : 3953
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 26, 2009

uugghhh...im really going to do this again for the sake of boredom
The basis to my point of view is not from a hate of guns. They have their uses. Nor do I think that criminals will be immediately inclined to obey a new law.
 
So my question, as it has always been, why do you think a gun ban will change anything?
 
Point is, most illegally owned guns are stolen from legal owners; thus the legal owner is the source of the end threat. It is not their fault per se, but there is a cause and effect. If like in the UK firearms are stored securely and remote from their ammunition, then it could be said that such a threat is undermined / cancelled out. I have less a problem with this management.
 
Mmmmhmmm....paolo for years in my family, and pretty well every single family i know (its not like my fridge isnt stocked with a shit load a venison, elk, moose, and the ram my room mate got this year) the gun ammo is kept seperate from the weapon it self. In my grandfathers house he knew the combo to get to the gun safe, my grand mother knew the combo to get to the ammo safe. In my parents house it was the same way. In my friends houses it runs in the same way with their parents. In my friends homes when you go there they will never disclose the combo to their gun safe to ANYONE, not even their own parents. But what do i know about guns, i probably have more experience with them than the london police force.
 
The UK is not the United States. The majority of the US does not live in a metropolitan area. And the majority of gun owners in the US are extremely capable, educated, and careful with their fire arms. Ive owned a rifle since i was 10 years old. Ive known how to use one, the do's and dont's, and its never been any mystery to me what a gun is meant for. Its a tool. A tool that can provide for a family, a tool that can be use for defence, but most of all a tool that KILLS. Rule #1 - you never point a gun at anything you do not intend to kill. period.
 
I live and run with some of the most redneck good hearted people you will ever know. they all have guns. none of them have ever pulled a gun on anyone, or shot anyone. I dont need statistics, i live this friend, hands down. YOU DO NOT. And its fortunate they never have, because when we fire a gun, we rarely miss our target, we arent gang bangers.
 
You will not ever take my guns from me. Because it is not you that im fearful of (well in the sense you think you have a right to take my guns ONLY) im scared of the guy who doesnt give a shit about the law. I also love my venison and elk. If you dont like guns, fine. Dont push your agenda on me. Be glad guys like me are around. Because when youre in a shitty situation in a convenience store and someone is holding it up, im the guy with the Concealed Weapons Permit who would save your ass and put the criminal down...........but you never hear about those stories, because after all....guns are only evil.
 
 You, my friend, have NO right to talk to me about something with which you have minimal experience with, and only read about in statistics and the good ol guardian. And that is all i have to say in the matter.
 

 

Of course bad lads will forever be bad, but that is not an excuse for good people to be dismissive of the responsibilities they allege to adhere to, thereby making them good. It is like a bar tender selling booze to an already drunk person who knows they are a repeat DUI offender.

You know youre getting old when your ol lady says "honey lets run
up stairs and make love" and you say "sorry i cant do both!"
For True Since 1984


paolosmythe
"Unemployed sulker"

Posts : 7120
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 26, 2009

Posted by lakia
So my question, as it has always been, why do you think a gun ban will change anything?
 
and my answer, as it has always been, fewer guns in circulation = lesser chance of their being acquired by those likely to do bad things with them.
 
for years in my family, and pretty well every single family i know the gun ammo is kept seperate from the weapon it self. In my grandfathers house he knew the combo to get to the gun safe, my grand mother knew the combo to get to the ammo safe. In my parents house it was the same way. In my friends houses it runs in the same way with their parents. In my friends homes when you go there they will never disclose the combo to their gun safe to ANYONE, not even their own parents. 
 
I've owned a rifle since i was 10 years old. Ive known how to use one, the do's and dont's, and its never been any mystery to me what a gun is meant for. 
 
I live and run with some of the most redneck good hearted people you will ever know. they all have guns. none of them have ever pulled a gun on anyone, or shot anyone. I dont need statistics, i live this friend, hands down. YOU DO NOT. And its fortunate they never have, because when we fire a gun, we rarely miss our target, we arent gang bangers.
 
and here as i said it would be, is the age old response from a pro-gun person.  tell me how good a driver you are....
 
it is of course understandable that you would speak from your OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.... but it is strange that you dismiss my POV coz of my being in the UK, even tho it considers those people who despite living in the US, act in a fashion which is completely alien to you.
 
Because it is not you that im fearful of (well in the sense you think you have a right to take my guns ONLY) im scared of the guy who doesnt give a shit about the law. If you dont like guns, fine. Dont push your agenda on me. Be glad guys like me are around. Because when youre in a shitty situation in a convenience store and someone is holding it up, im the guy with the Concealed Weapons Permit who would save your ass and put the criminal down...........but you never hear about those stories, because after all....guns are only evil.
 
come back to earth lakia.  you are getting carried away.  i am not pushing my agenda.... i am expressing an opinion, which in turn is giving you something to bash your keyboard about.
 
sadly, i will not be glad that there are people like you about, because despite what you might know or be able to do, your gun concealing heroism only exists due to the expense of others being able to hold up the convenience store in the first place! 
 
i should not be reliant upon people like you to safeguard my 7-11 experience, anymore than it should be jeopardised by a robber brandishing a firearm.  with all things considered, it would be preferrable if neither of you were armed.  is this not obvious?
 
You, my friend, have NO right to talk to me about something with which you have minimal experience with, and only read about in statistics and the good ol guardian. And that is all i have to say in the matter.
 
i do have the right, it is called freedom of speech.  and i am exercising this freedom to kill time and engage in debate, with you, an old friend with whom i've not had banter like this with for a long time.  see it for what it is.  incidentally, if you want to categorise me as 'a guardian reader' well that is fine..... but i have not read a stitch of that paper in at least a year.  impressive memory tho.
STICK OPPOSITION MOVEMENT
If you want to act 'serious',
then become a skier!


SpecialKallt...
"Intersting Jailbird"

Posts : 3572
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 26, 2009

paolo I was wondering if you would share your sources and other information of why guns are wrong.  I read some, but I can't find anything that is credible and/or not masked with emotions on the debate.  I would love to read some well formed arguments that are not based on the fear of death.  If all you have is ones that are for anti-gun laws because it would decrease deaths that is fine as well.  I just would like to understand the side a little more that rather live on their knees than die on their feet.
Hope:
everything will be okay in the end.
if it is not okay, then it is not the end.


SpecialKallt...
"Intersting Jailbird"

Posts : 3572
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 26, 2009

I especially love her closing statement.




Hope:
everything will be okay in the end.
if it is not okay, then it is not the end.


lakia
"PC Partyman"

Posts : 3953
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 26, 2009

preach it sister! great points.
You know youre getting old when your ol lady says "honey lets run
up stairs and make love" and you say "sorry i cant do both!"
For True Since 1984


reachben

Posts : 1356
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 26, 2009

 
 
 
 
 

[Edited by reachben on 26/02/2009 at 6:13 PM]

SpecialKallt...
"Intersting Jailbird"

Posts : 3572
ONLINE

Posted on Feb 26, 2009

Posted by reachben
 
 
 
 
 

[Edited by reachben on 26/02/2009 at 6:13 PM]


I love it an old joke, but still funny.  I don't want to live in a world that we can't make fun of everything and anything.

here it is so others don't have to link

Hope:
everything will be okay in the end.
if it is not okay, then it is not the end.


1-25 of 29 posts
1 2 Next

Problems, Comments, Suggestions

About |  Advertise |  Jobs |  Community Index |  Email |  FAQ |  Terms
Copyright ©2004 Colonies.com