These reviews were first put on my
blog over a period of time. I have compiled them together into this one topic. My season hasn't ended and I am still planning to ride more snowboards to review. There are more women's boards I have rode but can't post them at this time.
I test ride for Never Summer which means I give feedback on their snowboards (I am not paid). I do this with any board company I ride by making these reviews public. I do not have any obligations to promote one company and I ride boards that I enjoy to ride.
I judge each snowboard/binding with a list to critique them on.
Snowboards includes location, snow conditions, setup, first impression, weight, flex, turning, stable, pop, switch, pipe and overall impression.
Bindings includes location, snow conditions, setup, time to set up the binding, fit, first impression, appearance, comfort, functionality, flex, response, toe strap and overal impression.
Occasional there will be additions that I judge on: rails, powder, magne traction.
About me as a snowboarder:
- I just finished my 13th season snowboarding: 11 seasons in the NW and 2 seasons in Colorado.
- I am a freerider (I ride trees, powder, steeps, groomers, natural terrain) and I ride halfpipe.
- I am 5'6" and typically ride a 158cm for my all mountain board. Yes I do have the weight to back up the board length.
- I am a regular rider with a 22 inch width, +15, -15 stance angles.
- I wear size 8 womens snowboard boots. My main snowboard boots are Vans Omni Focus and my backup boots are Atomic Glamour.
07-08 snowboard reviews which are less comprehensive are
here
07-08 binding reviews which are less comprehensive are
here
My opinion is only my opinion...of how these boards rode. Take it as
you want. Please remember that each person interprets snowboards
differently, so please demo in order to get your own opinion. The reviews are in order by which I rode them.
Snowboard Reviews
2008-2009 Lib Tech Phoenix BTX
Disclaimer:
I was told that the board I was riding might be different from the
public's release of the Phoenix...so just a heads up. I'll update this
as I find out more.
Location: Loveland, CO
Snow Conditions: A mixture of powder runs and groomers. The majority being powder turns.
Setup: I rode the Lib Tech Phoenix with my Rome Madison bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: YES! A mtx board where it's not super grippy, rides like a regular board and it's the Phoenix...love it!
Weight: average
Flex: It
appears stiffer than it rides. The phoenix to me is stiffer between the
bindings giving it that stiff feel if you hand flex it, but when you
take it on snow...that gives you the control and stable feeling when
carving, turning and just freeriding. With the new btx and softer
nose/tail you still have the freestyle flex to do tricks with but
overall a stable ride.
Turning: The
phoenix is very predictable, but in a good way...you know what it is
going to do and there's no surprises. I put in the mtx part that the
mtx is mellower on the phoenix which in my opinion is great. It lets
the rider still control each turn, rather than the board just diving
in, locking to the snow and giving you a ride without you wanting it.
Most of the turns were powder turns, which I was able to switch it up
from long radius to shorter quick radius turns through some of the
varying conditions. Honestly this board I have yet to find a fault in
any type of turns on it.
Stable: Since
the morning was powder, I had no problems being stable with the
phoenix. When the snow got crustier under the powder, the board handled
the varying terrain very well. On groomers and hauling with the
phoenix, it felt stable and didn't notice any chatter or feel like I'd
need to slow down.
Pop: Holy
hell pop. Ive rode the Phoenix before, knew it was a poppy board with
the golden fleece core. Combine that with BTX and you have a board
capable of all mountain riding with freestyle flare, easy butters, good
pop and fun. I did hit a rail with the phoenix and fell on my ass, but
that was my own fault (shay + boxes = pain).
Switch: Briefly
rode the Phoenix switch when I hit up the groomers just to get an idea,
easy manuvering without catching an edge and handled riding switch
easily.
Powder: This powder run here
was with the phoenix. Even in the powder on flat terrain, the BTX
helped with keeping speed, staying afloat and not getting stuck. Most
of the morning with the Phoenix was making fresh powder turns, which
even for riding a smaller board it was fine. Definitely with the BTX
you can size down in board length.
MagneTraction (MTX):
I prefer a MTX that's more mellow, gradual letting the rider do the
work...not the board do the work for you. I told Jay that the mtx I
prefer is the one I don't notice, that I don't feel like i'm riding an
mtx board. Finally this phoenix was that and I'd be bummed if they
changed the mtx on the board. It still gripped the snow well on the
harder packed stuff but didn't feel like you were locked into the snow.
I liked that as a rider, I could control the board on edge.
Overall Impression: The
phoenix has always been a favorite of mine, one of those do everything
boards. I've liked that it's half cap/half sandwich construction but I
also grew up riding both of them and like the mixture of both. I found
it a lot more enjoyable with the mellow mtx and btx which trust me for
me to say that is a "wow" moment. The phoenix is a do everything board,
it handles varying terrain, it's predictable and it's that board that
you know won't let you down when riding any part of the mountain.
Ooh and it's got Beans! Be interesting to see how the new Bean topsheet holds up as compared to previous topsheets.
Just
my own personal graphic statement...any board with nipples, aliens and
coffee is stellar in my book. The graphics of the phoenix always stay
true.
Catalog/On-snow photos of the Lib Tech Phoenix here
2008-2009 GNU Riders Choice BTX
Location: Loveland, CO
Snow Conditions: A mixture of powder runs, groomers, some spring conditions of bumps and crust.
Setup: I rode the GNU Riders Choice with my Rome Madison bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: Damn...this is the mtx that I can feel it.
Weight: Tad heavier than average
Flex: The
Riders Choice is definitely a stiffer board, both longitudinally and
torsionally. The BTX mades it easier to play with than the past Riders
Choices I've rode and the MTX makes it more aggressive in turning. The
flex of the board is still a bomber aggressive stiffer freestyle board.
In some conditions, I love that board for bombing with and freeriding
but in really choppy terrain, I want a board with more give that
absorbs it up.
Turning: Personally
I like turning on boards without magne traction. The riders choice mtx
was a bit too aggressive without letting me as a rider really use the
sidecut as I see fit. I can see how some people like the grippy,
connected feeling of mtx but for me...I like having some extra slack
when I'm riding. The mtx was really solid on short quick turns, but
when I started to do longer spread out turns I felt I was fighting a
battle against the mtx contact points.
Stable: On
the hard packed groomers, had some fun just hauling with it, didn't
feel any vibrations coming from the board. Not as stable when riding
through some really choppy crud packed powder, definitely didn't absorb
the varying snow conditions that well.
Pop: Good
pop on this board, easy to get air off little side kickers and rollers.
I didn't ride jumps with the riders choice but I can see how people
choose this board for their stiffer freestyle board.
Switch: I
didn't really take the board out riding switch, just a couple small
180's but nothing to really test the switch riding with it.
Powder: Having
the banana tech in powder always helps, it makes it so easy to float
with and you don't feel like your having to work your back leg. I took
the Riders Choice through some smaller stashes of powder at Loveland in
the trees, it held up fine with the BTX. Cuts through the powder very
easily.
MagneTraction (MTX):
I prefer a MTX that's more mellow, gradual letting the rider do the
work...not the board do the work for you. I told Jay that the mtx I
prefer is the one I don't notice, that I don't feel like i'm riding an
mtx board. The riders choice you feel the mtx as soon as your on edge.
It's very aggressive, super grippy and connects like a pro ho to a pro
snowboarder...it doesn't wanna let go or give you any slack. That's just my personal preference with mtx, I enjoy the edge hold but I don't want to feel it.
Overall Impression: I
love the board but I don't love the magne traction on it. It's
definitely a more aggressive freestyle board, especially now with the
banana tech and magne traction you can pretty much do all with this
board. It's rideable in powder by the banana tech, stiffer flex overall
unless you break it in so holds up for freeriding and jumps. Then the
mtx is super grippy, holds an edge so if you ride icy conditions a lot
or can't hold an edge on your own...this will do it for you. For me, it
comes down to it...I'd like the board without the magne traction.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the GNU Riders Choice
here
2008-2009 Lib Tech Box Scratcher
Location: Loveland, CO
Snow Conditions: A mixture of powder runs, groomers, some spring conditions of bumps and crust.
Setup: I rode the Lib Tech Box Scratcher with my Rome Madison bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: I
was really nervous about the board at first, I'm not a park rat and
it's a 145cm board. It was the last board of the day and the one that
stood out the most as just plain fun on that board.
Weight: average
Flex: Very
easy to flex and maneuver. Softer flex towards to nose and tail but
between the bindings I didn't feet it was stiffer giving you some
control over the board. I actually liked that with the size it didn't
feel as loose when riding as the MC Kink and Skate Banana felt when I
rode them. This felt like the perfect flex for a BT snowboard to make
it work. Easy to ride and easy to turn.
Turning: I
found it really easy to initiate into turns and with the MTX being less
noticeable, it wasn't super grippy or aggressive at all. I didn't have
any problems with turns, definitely the shorter radius turns were the
best because of the sidecut just preferred it. The most time with this
board was in 4-5 inches of powder, so not a lot of hard packed carving
with this board so I didn't get the best feel for how it would handle
in a real hard carve. In fact these turns here (photo was modified with blue to make the lines pop out more) were done by the box scratcher.
Stable: After
the first run, it didn't feel like I was riding a much smaller board
because it does handle weight. During the powder turns, I was going
faster through some deeper snow while following Jay and I didn't feel
out of control on it. The only time I felt unstable was through really
choppy, power fields when I expected it to not handle as well. On
groomers with speed, no problems.
Pop: Tried a couple ollies with the board with some easy good pop to it but I had the most fun with nose rolls, tail rolls, butters and presses on it.
Switch: I
mostly took it switch on groomers, had no problems on riding switch and
it was super easy to spin around. Never caught an edge and easy swing
weight overall.
Powder: The
banana tech helped it tremendously in powder, it was the first time
I've been on a smaller board and seen how much a rocker/reverse camber
will affect how it handles powder versus the size of the board. It was
holding up pretty well in 4-5 inches of new snow with staying afloat
and still having control over the board.
MagneTraction (MTX): There
were some hard packed, icy spots on the mountain where I was glad to
have it on the board but even then it wasn't making it hold an edge
that well. The MTX was less noticeable so it gripped but less than some
others I rode.
Overall Impression: To
be honest...this is probably the most fun board I've been on in a
while. Even though I'm not a park rat and I barely ride rails...I liked
it because it was smaller and it was just fun to mess around with. It
surprised me by handling fine for riding outside of the park.
By
the time I rode the Box Scratcher, we were away from the park so no
testing it on rails (I had a good fall on the phoenix earlier in the
day).
I walked away from this board asking Jay about getting it
for next year since I do wanna start hitting rails more and having
something small and fun would be good for those non-new snow days.
Different from last year, the sidewalls are now power transfer internal versus the double sintered uhmv.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Lib Tech Box Scratcher
here
2008-2009 Endeavor Roots
Location: Whistler, BC
Snow Conditions: Mixture of groomed runs with slushy to hardpacked conditions.
Setup: I rode the Endeavor Roots with my Rome Madison bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: I
had a lot of time waiting for a friend to get his demo so I was
strapped into the board on flat doing ollies and presses with the
roots...definitely more fun than I was expecting.
Weight: Average weight
Flex: It's
a moderate to stiffer flex all mountain freestyle board. The carbon in
the topsheet gives it the stiffer feeling but it feels overall like a
more forgiving flex. I was impressed with the handling through slushy
and bumpier conditions with the flex. It absorbed them very well and
still held an edge.
Turning: The
roots has a deeper sidecut so it was easier to initiate turns with and
offered up really quick turns. I made some really sharp turns on it and
had no problem initiating and holding it into each turn. Long radius
turns were fine but I definitely spend more time making short radius
quicker turns.
Stable: I
found it relatively stable at higher speeds as long as it was groomed
runs. Definitely some moments on the choppier conditions with speeds
where I didn't feel as stable but also didn't feel out of control or
that the board was chattering
Pop: When
I was on the flat surfaces, it was really fun to pop ollies. I liked
that it was a tad stiffer flex for a park board, but you still had some
pop in the tail of the board. I was able to
Switch: I
had some fun riding switch with the roots...not only was the flex not
different but initiating turns was the same switch as regular. Since I
was riding with two others, I was able to ride switch a lot as I waited
up for them.
Pipe: I
honestly really want to ride this board in the halfpipe. Unfortunately
since the demo was at Whistler, there is no halfpipe unless you get
over to Blackcomb.
Overall Impression: I
was really glad I checked them out and rode an Endeavor. A lot of times
at demo's you get to ride the more popular brands and ignore the
smaller companies. This time due to readers wanting Endeavor info, I
rode an Endeavor and was stoked on it. Even though the board I was
riding was a all mountain freestyle board, it was a fun all mountain
freestyle board that I could do everything with. I wish I had more time
to spend on it to take it into other arenas of the mountain to really
test it's capabilities. However what I did get was a solid board for
the conditions I rode, handled the groomers to bumps with ease and made
it fun.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Endeavor Roots here
2008-2009 Never Summer SL R
Update:
Back at SIA, the SL was to be released as a regular cambered board.
This has changed and now the SL for 08-09 season will be a reverse
camber snowboard (Recurve Camber). Never Summer has their own patent
pending recurve camber rocker with two cambered areas from the feet out
toward the tip and tail and rockered under foot and a Vario Power Grip
sidecut radius.
Location: Majority of time at Steamboat, Colorado.
Snow Conditions: Slush, hard packed, ice, bumps, groomed runs.
Setup: I've been riding the Never Summer SL R with my Rome Madison bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: This
was the first board I stepped on with the new NS rocker and
Vario Power Grip
sidecut...it was very interesting and took some adjustment to get used
to it. However I was blown away by the new technology in comparing it
to K2 and Lib Tech but with the NS style.
Weight: Average
Flex: I've
always liked the flex on the SL, it's a really forgiving board and when
you combine that with the dampening that NS has...you get a board meant
for any condition, any rider and any style of riding. It adapts to
conditions very well...so much that I never find a fault in this board
because it truly is an all mountain do everything board. The flex is a
bit different than the normal SL, in fact when I first got the board I
doubted it was the SL R because it wasn't as soft as I remember. Even
with a wide stance, there's no issue with flexing this board
torsionally.
Turning: With
the new rocker on the SL R, NS has introduced a new sidecut, Vario Power Grip
which gives the board a lot more grip on hard packed and icy
conditions due to more contact points. It's easy to initiate on edge with the rocker and I like
that once on edge, you can flex the board into each carve and then pop
out into the next carve. Some of the days I've had on it were slushier
conditions and I didn't have to worry about digging my edge into the
snow and catching in the slush.
Stable: I've
taken this board down some choppy runs in the spring/winter mixture of
conditions and every time I feel stable on it no matter what speed I'm
traveling at. The board absorbs everything so you don't feel the
varying conditions or wear yourself out trying to ride bumpier
conditions. Since the nose and tail is raised up, you gain speed when
riding on flatter terrain.
Pop: The NS rocker is really fun for ollie'ing, it doesn't require as much effort to spring onto the tail and pop into an ollie. I
found it stiffer than it used to be in the tail to press, I have't
tried nose presses with the SL R yet. But definitely buttering and nose
presses took a tad bit more effort than on last year's SL.
Switch: It
was fine riding switch even with it being directional but I'm also used
to directional boards and switch. With the rocker its harder to catch
your edge, so it's super fun to ride around, ride switch and change it
up without feeling like you'll catch an edge.
Pipe: I
am still getting used to take reverse camber boards in the halfpipe.
The SL R was fine in the halfpipe, definitely with the new sidecut helps
it grip. I think with the size I was riding and that I've been riding
shorter boards in the halfpipe it took a couple runs to get used to it.
With the rocker, I need to make sure I don't pop or ollie in the pipe unless there's undervert. The
great thing in halfpipe with rocker is pulling spins, I'm still working
on spinning out of the pipe so right now it's spinning on the walls. I
don't have to worry about catching an edge with the rocker doing that.
Overall Impression:
The SL R definitely was impressive, after the adjustment period. I liked
that it could handle the whole mountain but I didn't sacrificice any
carving or freeriding with it. It was fine for riding trees and bumps,
never let me down.
I was bummed I didn't get a
chance to take the SL R out on a powder day. I hope to in the future and
that's when I'll update this review with the powder information. With
my experience from riding the Evo R in powder which has the rocker as
well...I'm expecting a great powder run.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Never Summer SL R here
2008-2009 Never Summer Evo R
Update:
Back at SIA, the Evo was to be released as a regular cambered board.
This has changed and now the Evo for 08-09 season will be a reverse
camber snowboard (Recurve Camber). Never Summer has their own patent
pending recurve camber rocker with two cambered areas from the feet out
toward the tip and tail and rockered under foot and a Vario Power Grip
sidecut radius.
Location: Majority of time at Steamboat, Colorado and some time at Copper Mountain, Colorado.
Snow Conditions: Slush, hard packed, ice, bumps, groomed runs, heavy powder.
Setup: I've been riding the Never Summer Evo with my Rome Madison bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: I've rode the Evo before and really loved it since it's a stiffer twin board. With the new reverse camber it's alot more about fun.
Weight: Bit lighter than average.
Flex: The Evo R is a stiffer freestyle board, but even then with the stiffness it
has some good tail and nose flex. The flex of the evo R really makes it a
solid ride for halfpipe with enough absorption for coming back into the
pipe. I liked that even with the stiffer flex, it's still solid for
freestyle manuvers. I did do some small airs on rollers with it and it
felt stable with landings.
Turning: With
the new rocker on the Evo R, NS has introduced a new sidecut, Vario Power Grip sidecut which gives the board a lot more grip on hard packed
and icy conditions. I took the board down a same icy traverse to get to
powder as the Lib with MTX and it held an edge against the icy traverse
just as well. You can still lay over the Evo R into each carve, it's
always been a board that could handle carving it up outside of the park
and even with rocker with the new sidecut, it grips and allows you to
quickly snap into short radius carves or extend out to long radius.
Stable: Since
the nose and tail is raised up, you gain speed when riding on flatter
terrain. I didn't wax the board and still noticed it held up speeds
when I'm riding along cat tracks and traverses better. The dampening is
a bit less on the Evo so over small bumps it didn't absorb as well, so
that takes some adjustment coming from a higher dampening board like
the Lotus.
Pop: The
Evo R has always been super fun for popping ollies and freestyle tricks.
With the rocker its just as easy to go into tricks. Butters/presses are
easy on the rocker, really takes no skill to be able to hold a butter
on any rocker.
Switch: I
had so much fun taking the board out and riding switch. Even in the
halfpipe when I went into switch riding, since it's a twin it's just
easier to dive into switch. With the rocker its harder to catch your
edge, so it's super fun to ride around, ride switch and change it up
without feeling like you'll catch an edge.
Powder: I
did manage to get powder turns on the last day of the season with the
Evo R. I was waiting for it and hoping to get some turns so test out the
rocker since a lot of my time has been on groomers with it. It came in
handy, even the evo is a stiffer park board but off groomers with the
rocker I was impressed. It floated through the heavier snow conditions
of last day here with a lot of ease.
Pipe: I
am still getting used to take reverse camber boards in the halfpipe.
However the Evo is one of my favorite halfpipe boards since it's twin,
stiffer and now with the new Vario Power Grip sidecut grips the snow
conditions so it's a good combo in the pipe since it has more contact points. I noticed this time with
the rocker, I just need to adjust to it so I don't pop too much off the
walls. I had a chance to take this board into two halfpipes,
steamboat's and copper's. Coppers on the day I took it, was icier
conditions and I had no problem holding an edge against the walls and
tranny. The great thing in halfpipe with rocker is pulling spins, I'm
still working on spinning out of the pipe so right now it's spinning on
the walls. I don't have to worry about catching an edge with the rocker
doing that.
Overall Impression: I've
had a lot of fun riding the new Evo R, it definitely offers more to the
freestyle rider that wants rocker. Even I was impressed with how well
it rode on groomers, steeper terrain and powder. The only downside was
with the less dampening, if you happen to run over a bumpy mogul field
of doom...you'll feel it by the end. In powder, it was fine with the
stiffer flex of the Evo and the float of the rocker. The NS rocker is
definitely a different ride than the banana tech and k2 rocker
technology. NS has a patent pending on this new design and its
definitely worth taking out for a ride.
On
a side note, the prototype that I have with the blank topsheet has a
neon green base which glows when riding. I've gotten so many comments
from people who love the glowing base and it definitely is fun to see
it stick out.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Never Summer Evo R
here
2008-2009 Never Summer Lotus
Location:
Majority of time at Steamboat, Colorado as well as other mountains over
Colorado. I've had the Lotus in my possession since early January and
it is my main snowboard.
Snow Conditions: Basically
every condition possible this winter: Slush, hard packed, ice, bumps,
groomed runs, powder runs, light powder, heavy powder.
Setup: I've
been riding the Never Summer Lotus with both sets of my Rome Madison
bindings (06-07 & 07-08) and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: Honestly
I've been waiting for this board when I first heard about it last
season that NS was going to release a women's premier. I have wanted to
ride it since then and so by the time I got on snow with it...I was
stoked from day 1. The board is breathtaking in person, I don't pay too
much attention to graphics (hence why I don't review graphics) but it's
a beautifully made snowboard. It rides as good as it looks.
Weight: Average women's weight.
Flex: I
consider the flex in between the old premier and the new premier F1. It
is a softer flex than the men's versions. But it has a multiflex camber
making it easy to turn on while still stiff enough to freeride with and
stable at speeds. Stiffer tail so when you riding powder, it holds you
consistently as you lean back. Softer mid flex allowing the easy turn
initiation. Since the flex is different longitudinally, it gives you a
variety that allows for all mountain riding. Torsionally, it's stable
with some give to it.
Turning: The
Lotus takes on the turning of the new premier F1 making it easier to
initiate turns. Once you are on edge, you can power into each carve,
holding the speed and then powering out ready for the next carve. With
the narrower waist designed for women's boot sizes, you can quickly
adjust from edge to edge on each turn. I have no problem laying over
quick short turns. It was nice having such a quick response when you
get close to other riders and need to avoid them downhill.
Stable: I've
been riding the 157cm as my everything board, in so many conditions.
I've only had one moment in moguls where I felt out of control and
really that's cause I suck at huge moguls. At faster speeds, the
dampening holds you stable as it absorbs the conditions.
Pop: I
like that with a stiffer tail you can roll back and spring off to pop
some ollies. Since I ride a lot of halfpipe with it, I've found myself
having to control the pop at the deck to make sure I don't make flat
landings but it's great when I'm riding a halfpipe with undervert where
you need to pop to stay in. The dampening really comes in handy during
halfpipe, I've had moments where I've thrown a 360 that sucked ass and
this board saved me from a scorp'd fall of death.
Rails:
I am not a rail rider by any means but I took my Lotus on a couple
smaller rails which handled fine. Even on wallrides, you can still come
up to butters or with the light swing weight, throw spins. With a
stiffer tail it takes more effort to butter the tail, I found it easier
when I'm doing butter presses in circles on the mountain.
Switch: The
Lotus is a directional board with a softer mid flex giving you a board
that still can ride switch. I'm also used to riding directional boards
switch but I had some fun day here in Steamboat riding switch on the
groomers.
Powder: I've
been able to spend some powder days on this board. I was really
surprised at first with how well it floated through some heavier
powder. It's got a slightly tapered, dual-radial sidecut which in
powder makes it super easy to stay above and still make sweet powder
turns.
Pipe: I've
spent a lot of time in the halfpipe with this board and it's my new all
mountain do everything board. Since it's a stiffer freeride board with
more aggressive sidecut you can really hold a edge on it and power it
through which works great in the halfpipe. My only downside with it in
the halfpipe is it's set back stance so I can't center the bindings on
it which means i'm riding halfpipe with more nose than tail.
Overall Impression: My
favorite board has been the Never Summer Premier and now it's been
replaced with the Lotus. I had a hard time putting this board down to
ride the other Never Summer's that I should be riding more. Similiar to
the premier but with a narrower waist width, this board excels in
everything the premier did.
My only issue is the stance, I ride
22 inches and I haven't maxed out the stance but I'm definitely at the
far ends of the inserts (I have mentioned to NS to widen the stance
inserts giving more opportunity for preference). In halfpipe I wish I
could center my stance a bit more but with the setback it's harder.
Even with that, the board works for me. There's a lot of give involved and it lets you have that forgiveness on the mountain.
It's
been my do-everything board. No matter what the conditions are or where
I plan to ride on the mountain...it holds its own. I've spent days in
the trees, hitting branches, stumps and this board is still in great
shape. On powder days, I know it won't sink me and in the halfpipe I
know it's gonna let me progress.
The most amount of my days this season have been on this snowboard. It is my #1 board to ride.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Never Summer Lotus here
Location: A-Basin, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Bluebird with hard packed conditions
Setup: I rode the Rossignol RPM with my Rome Madison bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: It's got killer graphics and it's super fun...what else do you need?
Weight: A little lighter than average
Flex:
I liked that the nose and tail were stiffer than between the bindings.
It still let the board freeride with some good torsional flex to it. I
didn't take the rpm on any rails but definitely a softer flex in the
center would have been fun to mess around with.
Turning: With
the deep progressive sidecut, it was really fun to make quick sharp
turns since it offered such quick response. It was easy to put up on
edge, wasn't very aggressive in turns. It's definitely one of those
boards you can progress with.
Stable: I was surprised by how stable the RPM when I went faster with it. When I got to bumpier terrain, it was able to flex through. Even
with an extruded base, this board with the right wax was bomber on the
mountain. I had no problems hauling down runs on the board.
Pop: I
had a ton of fun popping ollies with the RPM. It's got a stiffer tail
so you can really spring off the tail of the board and power it up with
pop.
Switch: The
RPM is twin with an even flex, consistent in turns and rode fine
switch. I felt fine going from regular to switch. I had some fun doing
tail and nose presses on the RPM since it was the same flex for both
the tail and nose.
Pipe: A-Basin doesn't have a halfpipe so no halfpipe riding.
Overall Impression: I
was quite surprised that I liked the RPM, but given the conditions and
just messing around having fun on it totally suited what it was meant
for.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Rossignol RPM here
Location: A-Basin, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Bluebird with hard packed conditions
Setup: I rode the K2 Duchess with K2 Virtue bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: Ahhh women's boards with quick edge to edge that you can bomb with but still have a good time messing around on the slope.
Weight: Average girls board weight.
Flex:
The Duchess features a softer tip and tail with more torsional
stiffness giving it the aggressiveness that excels the board on the
snow. The flex really lets you hold the board on edge, remaining stable
throughout each ride. It still gives you the all mountain freestyle of
being able to butter and press the board.
Turning: Like
I said on my review of the 07-08 Duchess, you can really power up the
board into each carve. The sidecut really adjusts to the rider, giving
you more forgiving turns or more aggressive turns. It was fun having a
board that I could easily manuever onto toeside or heelside turns. At
the same time, it allowed you to lay that board over on edge, hold a
solid long radius carve.
Stable: It
handles like a freeride board, cutting through the snow conditions
without any chatter/vibrations. Each time I've been on the Duchess it's
been a smaller size than I'm used to and it still feels stable when
riding.
Pop: I
had no problem ollie'ing with the Duchess, it gives you some good pop
off the tail of the board which was super fun over the rollers.
Switch: I noticed a slight difference when riding switch but was able to still carve with very little effort.
Pipe: There is no halfpipe at A-basin but I hope eventually to take the duchess into the halfpipe to test it out.
Overall Impression: The
only thing that has changed on the Duchess from 07-08 to 08-09 is the
graphics. It's always been a solid board for all mountain aggressive
female riders. This board is one of those do-it-all boards, you can
bomb down the mountain with or butter around with. It offers a really
smooth stable ride, easy turning for the progression and still lets you
carve it up when you get to that point.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the K2 Duchess
here
2008-2009 Lib Tech Mc Kink
Location: Steamboat Springs, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Variable.
I had the Mc Kink for 2 weeks here in Steamboat to test and ride.
Conditions were variable from hard packed to icy groomers, slushy bumps
and heavier powder.
Setup: I rode the Lib Tech Mc Kink with my Rome Madison bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: It's been a while since I've rode a board with a 25.9 waist width...so lets see how well this rides with me.
Weight: Average
Flex: The
Mc Kink is a freestyle specific board so combined with the Banana Tech
(BT) it's overall a softer, loose feeling board on the mountain. I
found the flex great for messing around with, hit some small rails, any
tail or nose butters and ollies. When I took the board to choppier,
bumpy terrain the loose feeling of the BT came out and definitely had
to maneuver more carefully with the softer flex. I took it in the
halfpipe but definitely a softer flex than I'd like for riding halfpipe
with.
Turning: It
was slower edge to edge with the wider waist width, which I was
expecting. The waist width on the Mc Kink is 25.9, I wear a size 8
women's boot. I definitely had to work harder the first couple days as
I got used to it. After a while, I found no problems with it on
carving.
Stable: When
I took the board through the groomed runs, it was fine at speeds. But
when I took it through more chopper stuff on groomed runs, it wasn't as
stable. I definitely speed checked with the board. I was also riding
with skiers so it's definitely a keep up and ride fast moments
sometimes.
Pop: Definitely
has pop, I had some fun ollie'ing off rollers with the mc kink. In the
pipe it had more pop than I was used to, had a couple close calls on
landing flat but made it out alive. One thing that I haven't done in a
while with a board is helicopters where you spin in circles going down
the hill...this was where I got a good taste of how you won't catch an
edge on this board. I was showing others how to helicopter and it was
just so easy, never had to worry about catching edges with the mc kink.
Switch: I got some good time in riding this board on the easier terrain at Steamboat during Gaper Day.
This is where I spent a lot of time on the board riding switch as well
as a couple other days during the last week. The board was fine on
switch, no noticeable difference in flex that I could tell and I had a
lot of fun doing nose and tail presses into riding switch on it.
Powder:
I'm adding this powder in because I was able to ride a good amount of
powder with this board. Not your typical Steamboat light and fluffy
powder either...this was heavier, days old powder. The BT really came
into play here in the powder. It was the best riding with this board
was finally using the BT in the deep stuff. If you want to see pictures
of the turns and powder from that day check here. Overall in powder, it excelled even for a softer freestyle board. I really had a good time making turns with the BT.
MagneTraction (MTX): It
helped to have the MTX on this board, definitely combined with the BT
and softer flex, you needed more to grab the snow on edge which is
where the MTX came in. I didn't notice it as super grippy on the ice
but definitely held the snow better during those moments.
Pipe: I
wouldn't ride the Mc Kink in the halfpipe all the time. Too soft and
forgiving of a flex, the MTX was good to grip the icy wall but overall
I didn't feel as stable with the flex being too absorbing. It's a park
board...but when I did do a press on the deck of the pipe, it was fun
to have around.
Overall Impression: For
a softer more freestyle board, it was super fun on the mountain. Even
for a wider waist width, I had fun on the Mc Kink. It is definitely
more forgiving and loose when riding which is personal preference on
how you like it. I had some days where that was perfect for me and
others where I wanted more aggressive. I'm definitely hoping to try
more Libs with BT and MTX to get a better idea of the more all
mountain/freeride boards for next year. The Mc Kink was super fun to
ride and an amazing ride in powder.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Lib Tech MC Kink here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Cold with hardpacked groomers and some choppy terrain.
Setup: I rode the Drake Player with Drake Muse bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: It is a snowboard that's predictable. You don't have to worry about naked people coming out of the closet with this board.
Weight: A little noticeably heavier
Flex: I
thought it was stiffer for a all mountain freestyle board mostly
longitudinally, torsionally it had some give to it but definitely a
slower edge to edge without a softer torsional flex.
Turning: The
player is classified as a mid level board which I definitely agree on,
I'd even say more entry to mid level seeing that it was very forgiving
on edge without putting you in too much of a carve right away and it
was gradually increasing with the transitional sidecut. Overall was
very forgiving of a ride.
Stable: I
found the player to be quite stable for a more all mountain freestyle
board. I had no problems with it when riding faster on the runs and
going through choppier terrain.
Pop: I didn't test the pop on the player by doing any ollies or other freestyle riding with it.
Switch: The
player is directional and I noticed the flex was different when riding
switch. Once I adjusted to it, felt fine on it making turns.
Pipe: I didn't ride halfpipe with the Drake Player unfortunately.
Overall Impression: It
was a bit less of a snowboard than I'd like, a little too easy and
forgiving. Overall it was a decent ride, definitely a board for someone
progressing in snowboarding to learn on. I like that it has structurn
base, you really notice in varying conditions that base and how well it
holds up.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Drake Player here
2008-2009 Rossignol Retox
Location: A-Basin, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Bluebird with hard packed conditions
Setup: I rode the Rossignol Detox with my Rome Madison bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: It looks like a bag of fun which the artistic flare and lets see how this nose/tail ride.
Weight: Average weight
Flex: I
wish I could have taken it in a halfpipe because it handled stiffer
between the bindings with a softer tail for easy buttering and presses.
The nose was a tad stiffer which allowed it to be fine freeriding with.
I was impressed that it wasn't a soft noodle for a freestyle board but
a freestyle board that could handle the whole mountain.
Turning: The
retox was detuned so it was not catchy or hooky when riding. For a twin
freestyle board, it rode fine on groomers. I felt confident laying it
over into each carve. The retox features a deep progressive sidecut
allowing you to lay into over into quick short turn carves.
Stable: I
took the retox through some choppier conditions which handled decent,
definitely if I had picked it up to higher speeds it would have been a
bit less stable.
Pop: You
could load up onto the tail and pop ollies off the shovel nose/tail
without any problems. I did find it funny to press with at first but
then grew into it.
Switch: The
retox handled great riding switch, felt in control and stable on both
edges. I was centered and so riding switch was no problem.
Pipe: A-Basin doesn't have a halfpipe so no halfpipe riding.
Overall Impression:
It was interesting to ride with the shovel nose/tail on the retox...I
still liked the snowboard which offered up a solid ride in the
conditions for the day. Stable for freeriding with some give to handle
freestyle tricks. As a new board for Rossignol's 08-09 line-up it'll be
interesting to see how it's handled, the design is rad and artistically
creative.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Rossignol Retox here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Cold with hardpacked groomers and some choppy terrain.
Setup: I rode the Salomon Loft with Salomon Absolute bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: Really...people actually spend a lot of money to ride this? I didn't think it was anything special.
Weight: I didn't really notice the weight of the board which means it wasn't lightweight but it wasn't heavy either.
Flex: Torsionally
and longitudinally stiff. It could cut through the snow good, but
definitely felt it wasn't that responsive in riding, probably the most
dead board I've rode in a while.
Turning: I
liked that the loft offered really quick edge to edge, but I felt it
was a lot more torsionally stiff not allowing me to really twist the
board to make shorter radius carves on it. However making really long
radius carves were a blast, especially with it holding speed and not
feeling out of control on the board.
Stable: It
held fine at higher speeds, definitely a stiffer board to ride. I took
it to faster speeds on it, didn't notice the base being any faster than
any other boards I rode for the on-snow demos. I was surprised when I
took it to ice, I had heard it gripped very well on harder ice and the
board I rode was decent but nothing that grabbed the snow and held it.
Pop: I honestly don't think it had any...felt too stiff and dead to get any good pop out of it.
Switch: I had no problems riding it switch.
Pipe: I
didn't get the chance to take it into the halfpipe. I really would have
liked to see this board in there since it's stiff. Hopefully another
time.
Overall Impression: I
wasn't really that impressed with the loft. Definitely a board for
really fast hard packed groomed runs where you just want to bomb down,
making barely any turns. In fact now that I think about it...it's the
perfect board for the beginners that just point it cause they can't
turn yet.
I'm going to take this board out again since
obviously it wasn't that great for me. But I only rode it in hard
packed conditions so I would like to see how it handles in softer snow,
powder and choppy crud.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Salomon Loft here
2008-2009 O-matic Celebrity
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Cold, overcast with hard packed groomed runs.
Setup: I rode the O-matic celebrity with Flux Titan bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: hey...this handles pretty good for a more freestyle specific board.
Weight: Average. I might be wrong on this since the flux were heavier, the board weight could be lighter than average.
Flex: Definitely
one of the more softer flex boards I rode for the day, but it was still
stable to ride groomers. I liked that the nose and tail were softer
while giving a good stiffer flex between the bindings allowing it to
handle chop relatively good.
Turning: Definitely
a easy more mellow sidecut, with slower edge to edge response. By the
end of the day it was a fun mellow ride for making turns, not
aggressive and letting the rider slowly ease into each turn.
Stable: It surprised me by cutting through the choppier terrain without any problems. I felt it a little unstable at higher speeds.
Pop: Super
poppy and easy to ollie with. You could just load back onto the tail
and your already flying superman with the spring of the board.
Switch: It
was easy to initiate into switch turns and riding switch with. It's a
true twin...so rode perfectly fine with the flex riding switch. I had a
lot of fun going from regular to switch and buttering it up in
helicopters with the Celebrity.
Pipe: I didn't take the Celebrity into the halfpipe but hopefully next time I ride it...I will.
Overall Impression:
I had fun riding with it as it offered up a fun ride for more freestyle
on-snow tricks. It was nice having it be a easier ride. Still was easy
to ride and decent on the groomers.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the O-matic Celebrity here
2008-2009 Ride Concept UL
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: A mixture of hardpacked groomers, soft powder and bumps.
Setup: I rode the Ride Concept UL with Ride ZETA bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: Yay! It isn't a bad ride, still doesn't grip on ice as well but not hating this board at all.
Weight: Light
Flex: Definitely
not a soft board but it's not a stiff board either. I found it with a
really forgiving flex. Torsionally easier to maneuver for carving and
the longitudinal flex definitely softened towards the tail. I found it
a lot easier to butter the tail than the nose.
Turning: I
found it easy to lay into each carve, allowing the rider easier carve
initiations while still holding a good edge in each turn. Had very
quick edge to edge response with the lighter weight.
Stable: The
Concept UL rode smoothe on groomers and handled fine through the
bumpier terrain. The only time it wasn't stable was hitting ice, where
it didn't grip as well as other boards I rode that day. Definitely
noticeable. No problem
with chatter or handling higher speeds, definitely a fun board to just
bomb down the runs with since it holds speeds very well.
Pop: The
Concept UL definitely had some pop to it, I had no problems with ollies
and butters even when I was getting tired since it was the last run of
the day.
Switch: I had no problems riding switch on the Concept UL, it was actually really easy to swing around and ollie into switch riding with the board then lay it over into carves switch.
Pipe: I
did not take this board into the half pipe. It was the last board of
the day and by that time, just tired overall so skipped on the halfpipe
run. I did take the board on the icy patches popping up over Keystone,
still washed out on the snowboard but felt it grip better than some
other Ride snowboards I've been on.
Overall Impression: I
don't know the price tag on the Concept UL for 08-09 but I was
surprised that it is $750 for this year. It was a lighter board that
still rode very well carving and giving the rider some good give for
more freestyle fun. But even then, I don't see why it costs so much.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Ride concept UL here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Snowing with hard groomed to packed powder conditions on the runs.
Setup: I rode the Flow Infinite with the Flow Essence bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots.
First Impression: Lets
see how this Flow does...already stoked on every flow I've rode so far
and definitely hoping they keep up the good work of making solid
boards. Oh yes and I remember trying to figure out about the naked
chick on the board, the graphics are sweet and you can see Titty or at
least that's what I kept telling the rep.
Weight: lighter than average weight
Flex: It
was definitely a medium to stiffer flexing board. Definitely perfect
flex for riding pipe and freeriding with while offering some good
freestyle characteristics.
Turning: The
infinite has really quick response from edge to edge. It takes the
slightest movements and your already carving up the mountain. I had no
problems with initiating each turn on the board with the DT sidecut as
it does put you into the carve quick but then mellows out so you can
really arc each carve on it. Took a little bit to get used to but in
quick situations where a sharp turn was needed, it saved my ass.
Stable: I
found the Infinite really stable on the hard packed groomers but when I
took it into choppier terrain it wasn't as stable. When really bombing
with it down the slope, didn't feel as confident on it at higher
speeds. It did hold an edge on the ice very well, no slipping or
washing out with it.
Pop: When I rode it in the pipe, I was caught by surprise by the pop but definitely liked it. More pop than I was expecting.
Switch: It's
a directional freestyle board but still rode fine switch. I remember
taking it a lot faster riding switch with the infinite and it was fine
on the mountain.
Pipe: Risto
rides pipe and the infinite is his board so of course it rides fine in
the pipe. Definitely a fun board to take in the pipe.
Overall Impression: I
really liked the infinite especially when riding pipe with it. I
probably wouldn't take it to higher speeds or more aggressive terrain
but for everyday groomers it rode fine. Really quick response and
carved very well.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Flow Infinite here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Clear day, hard packed groomers.
Setup: I rode the K2 Zero with K2 Auto Agogo's and my Vans Omni Focus Boots size 8.
First Impression: Hmm those K2 guys better not have lied to me on the chairlift that it's amazing and I should ride it next...ok they didn't lie!
Weight: It's light...I didn't even think I had a snowboard on my foot while riding up the chairlift.
Flex: When
I first took the zero out for turns, it felt like I was riding a much
shorter board than I was. I had no problem flexing the board
torsionally to make quicker short radius carves on it and man you
really could lay it over without losing the longitudinal stable ride
that it is.
Turning: It carves on a dime is what I wrote down in my notes, super quick edge to edge response. Similar to the Turbo Dream, the zero
features the hyper progressive sidecut which I really prefer cause it
doesn't give you that hook or catching feeling when your on edge going
from turn initiation to carving. It held an edge when you took it to
faster long radius turns and had no problem gripping the snow.
Stable: I
wasn't expecting much stability because the zero is a lighter
snowboard, but it did handle surprisingly well when I was taking it
over choppier conditions, firm and hard packed it still handled well at
higher speeds. K2's combo of the core and carbon definitely adds to the
stability of the snowboard.
Pop: Every
board I've rode with a bamboo core generally has amazing pop because of
the core. The zero is not exempt from that. It was fun to butter as
well.
Switch: I had no problems riding the zero switch. It does have a small (3/4")setback and even I was surprised to hear that.
Pipe: The
zero with it being light and a really good edge grip on the ice handled
solid in the halfpipe. Easy to throw around but still stable.
Overall Impression: I
rode the Zero by accident. I was going up the chairlift with some guys
from K2 and were stoked on riding the Turbo Dream and the new Auto
agogo's. They recommended I try the Zero. If they hadn't recommended
it, I wouldn't have rode it. Definitely glad they did recommend it. It
was the lightest board that I rode during the demos, but still was a
solid ride especially when going up to higher speeds on it.
The
Zero has a wooden core built from bamboo which gives it the strength,
good flex and a lot of pop while reducing the board weight. The Zero is
K2's eco-friendly snowboard.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the K2 Zero here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Snowing with hard groomed to packed powder conditions on the runs.
Setup: I rode the Rome Blue with Rome Madison's Bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots (also rode the Rome Vamp boots with this setup)
First Impression: Ah I love when I can ride a more aggressive women's board that is meant to be rode and rode hard.
Weight: Women's boards are always lighter...that's why I like them.
Flex:
I was surprised by the longitudinal flex on the Blue. I was riding a
smaller size Blue than I'd like and even then surprised me by the
stiffness of the board. Even torsionally stiffer than I was expecting
but gave you good response when making sharper short radius turns. But
that allows it to be the more aggressive all mountain board it is.
Turning: I
found the Blue to be pretty aggressive on carving with, definitely a
board that would ride you if you weren't a solid rider. Once on edge,
it definitely holds you into each carve but also really quick carving
with the Blue. I liked the response it gave you when riding, you could
lay over each turn and come full carve out of it with more speed.
Stable: Because
it's a stiffer board, it does hold speeds very well. I had no problem
charging on the 154cm that I was riding and didn't feel the
chatter/vibrations that I could have felt with a smaller board. The
base definitely felt faster to ride on.
Pop: When
riding the Blue, I didn't do any ollies or test the pop of it. I was
riding with the Rome Vamp boots for the first couple runs and honestly
having a softer boot than my Vans Omni Focus made me feel unstable in
my ankle...so I kept away from performing any freestyle manuevers.
According to Rome, the Blue has Straight Triax 3.0 Carbon Laminate
giving it "carbon ollie pop with a responsive flex for light riders."
Switch: I didn't ride that much switch with the blue to be honest. But it is a directional board.
Pipe: I
had no doubt when riding the blue on the icy pipe walls, held an edge
and one of my more favorite boards in the pipe. I was also riding a
154cm so easier to spin and still was stable to ride.
Overall Impression: The
Blue was the only women's board I rode at Keystone for on-snow demo's
and it was not a let down when comparing to the men's boards. It was
actually a better ride than some of the men's boards I rode. It's a big
mountain, more aggressive women's board for girls who charge.
Definitely a board I wish I had spent more time on to make more
freestyle riding with like switch and ollies to butters. The most
freestyle I got with it was in the half pipe where it was a solid
performer, the small size I rode was perfect for spinning while being
able to hold an edge on the icy walls.
It most impressed me with
the speed and stability when riding. I never felt like it was "buck me"
around or not handle anything the terrain offered. It floated well in
the couple inches of powder that was there on the runs, I have one
photo where it's covered in snow.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Rome Blue here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Snowing with hard groomed to packed powder conditions on the runs.
Setup: I rode the 159cm Nitro Wiig with Raiden Eris bindings and switched between my Vans Omni Focus boots and Vans Omni boots.
First Impression: Damn I've been missing out by not riding Nitro's in a while.
Weight: A bit lighter than average
Flex:
I found it torsionally a bit more rigid which let the board handle the
terrain and handle speeds without any chatter. I found the wiig easy to
absorb the changing terrain that I had during that day, the snow was
more bumpy and ranged from hard packed groomers to powder bumps.
Turning: Whether
I was riding regular or switch, the wiig charged and held each turn
gripping the snow without hesitation. The wiig features a
tri-progressive sidecut blended 3 radiuses that take you into each arc
of the turn and accelerate you into the next one. I had no problems
with holding a carve on the wiig even for a more freestyle board that
it's supposed to be.
Stable: I
was surprised at how stable the Wiig rode, for a more all terrain
freestyle board it definitely charges on the mountain. For 08-09 it
features FX smartbase 4.0 which really means it's a faster board that
adjusts it's base density to the snow temperature. Of all the boards I
rode, this was the fastest in terms of how the base rode. It was the
only board in my notes that I wrote how much it charged on the
mountain.
Pop: This
board has pop and definitely a fun flex to mess around with in butters
and ollies. I was surprised because it handled stiffer but with a good
amount of pop for the freestyle board it's meant to be.
Switch: The wiig is a twin board, rides the same switch as it does regular.
Pipe: Since
the snow had picked up, I wasn't able to take the Wiig into the
halfpipe. Hopefully in the future I will be able to ride with it in the
pipe.
Overall Impression: When
I took out the Nitro Wiig I kept trying to remember why in the world I
hadn't rode a Nitro in a while...and I had no reasons for why.
Definitely stepping back on a Nitro felt good, my first board was a
nitro and now 13 years later...they still make good snowboards.
The
wiig was one of my favorite charging boards to ride, even though it's
not meant to be that according to the catalog. I like the boards that
step outside of the box, for a pro model the board is meant to handle
it all and not let you down. I was impressed with how well the wiig
rode in the conditions. I do wish I could have taken it through the
halfpipe to see how well it handled on icy conditions.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Nitro Wiig here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Overcast and cold with hard packed groomed runs.
Setup: I rode the Burton Fix with Burton Lexa EST and my Vans Omni Focus size 8. Looking at the photos now, I am setback on the Fix with more nose than tail during the demo.
First Impression: I
was expecting a softer flexing board that is easy to butter similar to
the banana or rocker boards...and the fix was not in those categories. I believe I rode a stiffer fix than what is going to be released to the public.
Weight: Average but on the lighter side of average.
Flex: The
fix is stiffer between the bindings making it overall a stiffer board
that I expected. I found it to be a medium flex board, not very stiff
but definitely not a soft noodle on the mountain. I didn't find the
tail to be soft when I would butter and tail press with it. I didn't
test out the nose for presses but I didn't notice the nose being too
soft when riding.
Turning: Had
no problems holding an edge and carving on this fix. It was torsionally
stiffer than I expected and with the pop, you could really carve it up,
initiating each turn and pop into the next turn. It was really fun to
do slash turns with the board in true surfer style on the mountain. I
took it in a little side run with some powder and it held afloat just
fine.
Stable: I
was surprised by how stable this board was on groomers and holding
speed. The mid wide shape definitely gives it more stability when
riding and I didn't question that it couldn't handle speed through the
groomers.
Pop: This
board has no problem with pop. Whether it was just popping ollies on
the flat groomers or riding pipe and popping 180's and 360's, the board
was super fun with pop. It didn't butter as easily as I would have
thought. I thought it was me as a rider, then I saw a guy bigger than
me with the Fix later in the day...I watched him try to butter the
board and he was having a hard time buttering it. I was riding the
158cm Fix which is generally the size I ride everywhere.
Switch: When I was riding switch on it, it felt grabby on the toe edge only which surprised me for a true twin.
Pipe: I actually liked how the Fix rode in the pipe, still held an edge and the pop was great for riding pipe.
Overall Impression: I
was kind of blown away by how the Fix rode. I was expecting it to be
like the catalog, a softer flexing park board and in my opinion it
wasn't. It was a fun board, not as fun as the uninc in my opinion but
definitely a different ride with the scoop tech. I think it still needs
to be worked on to make it more buttery like the banana and rocker
boards since it will be compared toForums - New Topic them. In terms of flex, I totally
disagree that it's a noodle or a 3 on the burton flex.
Side
Note: I'm going to re-try the Fix hopefully towards the end of this
season to see if the model I had demo'd was a stiffer release. I'm
still surprised by how stiff it rode to me.
Other Reviews: I am going to put other reviews up because this is one confusing board. Here is Hoon's review
of the Burton Fix. Not sure what size he rode but it's another review
and it also makes me question the Fix Flex released at demos this year.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Burton Fix here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Cold, overcast with hard packed groomed runs.
Setup: I rode the DC XFB with Technine Suerte's and my Vans Omni Focus Boots size 8.
First Impression: Really surprised by how it rode but happy with it as well. I hope the bling doesn't blind me riding down the mountain either.
Weight: Average Weight
Flex: I
was expecting a softer flexing board, but the XFB is definitely a
medium stiffness board. The carbon fiber and kevlar between the feet
definitely stiffen up the board to make it rideable outside of the
park.
Turning: When
I rode the hardpacked groomers with the XFB, it definitely held fine on
edge. Didn't feel grabby at all, no hooking or catching the edges. It
was easy to go from toe edge to heel edge. Taking it from long radius
to short radius turns, each turn was stable and smooth transitions.
Stable: I
was really surprised by how stable this board was when riding. For a
more all mountain freestyle board on groomers, it was definitely a
board you could carve with outside the park and still feel stable at
higher speeds.
Pop: I
had a lot of fun with the pop on this board with ollies. This was one
of the few boards that I would ollie into a butter with and pull off
180'ing out, just had so much fun with it.
Switch: For a directional twin, had no problems riding switch on the board.
Pipe: It didn't want to hold an edge in the halfpipe on the icy walls, just washed out each time.
Overall Impression: I
enjoyed riding the board, it was fun but still a board you could make
turns with. Not overly aggressive and a board any rider could ride. For
the first year of DC snowboards, it's definitely a work in progress but
a good solid ride to expand on.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the DC XFB here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Clear day, hard packed groomers.
Setup: I rode the K2 Turbo Dream with K2 Auto Agogo's and my Vans Omni Focus Boots size 8.
First Impression: Wow this is like having sex down the mountain; it's fun, interesting and gotta adapt to what your feeling.
Weight: Average weight
Flex: The
flex is perfect for all mountain freestyle. Obviously with the rocker
it's super easy to flex the nose and tail of the board but the
torsional flex keeps the board stable when riding. Compared to my
gyrator, it handles the groomers a lot better including bumps and
choppier terrain.
Turning: The
best turns that I had with the Turbo Dream were more long radius spread
out turns, no problems with short radius quick edge to edge turns but
man for some reason the long radius just felt so good on the board. The
turbo dream features the hyper progressive sidecut which I really
prefer cause it doesn't give you that hook or catching feeling when
your on edge going from turn initiation to carving.
Stable: I
had no problem taking the board faster down the mountain or feeling any
chatter on the board. Not many people were on the mountain yet, so I
really had fun cruising on empty runs with it.
Pop: I
had a lot of fun popping off little rollers or the sides of trails with
the board. It was easy to butter of course and do presses.
Switch: I spent some good time riding switch on it and really had no problems with it. It's a setback twin.
Pipe: Rode okay, but not really a board I'd take into half pipe a lot.
Overall Impression: The rocker tech is less than the gyrator but still allows for some sweet easy maneuvering through powder. I
was told to keep my weight centered to get the best feel of the board
and it was right. If I put my weight in the backseat, I really had less
control over the snowboard while on groomers. I had a fun time riding
it while still able to carve up the mountain with a good stable ride.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the K2 Turbo Dream here
2008-2009 Capita Black Death Inc
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Bluebird with mixture of groomers to powder runs.
Setup: I rode the Capita Black Death Inc with Union Trilogy bindings and my Vans Omni Focus boots size 8.
First Impression: My god...the BSOD is back and better! Honestly it was like coming home.
Weight: Average weight
Flex:
Torsionally the flex reminded me of the old bsod. I could twist the
board to take in shorter turns but also the longitudinal flex gave a
really stable ride. In the powder had no problem keeping the nose
afloat (but I was only in 4-6 inches of powder at the time).
Turning:
I found every turn really smooth in transitioning between turns and
allowing the rider to power out of a turn into the next turn. The turn
initiation was easy and once on edge, you felt stable. I took the
boards from wide long radius turns to short radius turns, each time
looking back to see a solid line in the snow where the edge hold held a
good arc and let the rider control the turn.
Stable:
I never doubted the board handling speed, never felt chatter and felt
like it charged in the conditions. Riding the 159cm I took it fast to
pass a group of skiers on the mountain, it held fine.
Pop: I didn't have a chance to pop ollies with the board, there was powder and it was a charging morning.
Switch:
The Black Death is directional with a .5 setback stance but I had no
problems riding it switch, noticed very little difference in how it
handled. I'm used to riding directional boards switch as well.
Pipe:
One wall in the halfpipe was powder, the other was ice. The Black Death
rode fine in the pipe, holding an edge on the ice and was really fun
slashing the powder on the other wall.
Overall Impression:
The black death reminded me of my bsod in a couple ways, mostly the
flex and effective edge. It is a different constructed board (the
original bsod was cap construction, the black death is sidewall
construction which does ride differently plus slightly different core
among other slight differences) but it definitely goes back to the old
bsod feeling. I enjoyed making turns on the board, felt really
confident on the board when riding and was stoked Capita is putting out
a board that really can handle the whole mountain.
I would like
to ride the board again when conditions are more brutal on the mountain
to really test how it rides overall. I didn't ride the board through
much crud/choppy conditions because it was the first runs of the
morning with hardpacked groomers.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Capita Black Death Inc
here
Binding Reviews
Location: A-Basin, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Bluebird with hard packed conditions
Setup: I rode the K2 Virtues on the K2 Duchess with my Vans Omni Focus boots.
Time to set up the binding: Really quick. JP gets it done.
Fit: I
was able to get my boot in the binding, but I definitely would have
sized up on the binding since it was a little too snug in the width of
the binding. I just adjusted the straps a bit better.
First Impression: They are super neon...so they are super fun. Basically the Auto agogo bindings without the Auto.
Appearance: The neon is pretty funny to look at when you first get on it. It screamed "killer 80's brah!" at me and who can resist that?
Comfort: This
binding is all comfort whether its in the ankle strap, the highback or
the base. The ankle strap has neoprene gel zones that mold the strap
around your boot.
Functionality: The
ankle strap is set on the hinge mount so when you are not strapped in,
it moves out of the way from the binding (you can see this in the photo
where my boot is not in the binding). Easy to adjust the straps while
on the mountain which I messed around with a couple times to adjust the
toe strap to my boot better.
Flex:
I prefer a softer flexing binding that allows give and take when
riding, and the virtue which has the same highback as the agogo is
exactly that. The highback molded great with my Vans boots and offered
enough support and flex when riding.
Response: It's
not a difficult binding to ride, I thought it was fairly easy. The
response is good but it's not overally responsive either giving the
rider a lot of leverage when riding.
Toe Strap: I
rocked the toe strap as a cap strap which I had no problem keeping over
the toebox of my boot. It's comfortable and no issues with pressure
points.
Overall Impression: This is the binding if you want the agogo's
but aren't interested in the auto binding. It's basically the same
binding with some very minor differences (ratchets). I am stoked on the
bindings overall but I really like the idea of the auto's. However
these bindings are cheaper and definitely a solid binding for what you
get.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the K2 Virtue here
2008-2009 Drake Muse
Women's Binding
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Cold with hardpacked groomers and some choppy terrain.
Setup: I rode the Drake Muse bindings on the Drake Player snowboard with my Vans Omni Focus boots.
Time to set up the binding: It was very cold, so it did take a while to set up the bindings with it freezing out.
Fit:
My foot fit fine with no gaps in space, the straps were adjusted to my
boot but I didn't feel that the bindings fit my boots as well as they
would have if I had Northwave boots. I should have adjusted the toe
strap to fit my boot better.
First Impression: This
is my first time riding Drake bindings, haven't heard much about
them...lets see how well they perform for the more higher end women's
binding.
Appearance: Lets see honest...I hate gold. I have only liked one binding in a gold color and that was the ride
sigma movement...because it gave you non-blingy, elegant gold. The Muse
binding is the opposite of that, giving a bling, pure gold that just
screams 80 year old in Florida with red lipstick wearing spandex...yes,
that's a good picture to paint. The highlight is it's not much gold on
the binding but enough in the noticeable spots.
Comfort: I
didn't think my boots fit that great with the binding so in terms of
comfort, it wasn't amazing. On heelside turns I could feel the highback
dig into my boot but it was also a stiffer highback. I think overall
with my boot combo it just didn't work. I want to try the bindings with
a Northwave boot which is what they are matched to as compatible. I did
like the padding that the binding offers when riding, definitely
dampens it up so you can't feel the chatter on the snowboard.
Functionality: You
have quick adjustments on the straps to adjust them or center them to
your boot when riding which is a plus. I wasn't a fan of the ratchets.
Flex: I
was expecting more as a higher end women's binding, quick response
while offering a stiffer highback. To me, the binding fell as a medium
flex binding.
Response:
I would say definitely as a entry level to intermediate progressive
binding, this will give you good response without being too touchy on
the response and too slow to move.
Toe Strap: I
didn't like it, I had to adjust it on the mountain and didn't trust
that it would stay put when riding. I really cranked it down just in
case. You can rock it as a cap strap or regular but both ways I rocked
it, didn't feel 100% fit to my boot.
Overall Impression: The
muse has been upgraded with softer padded straps and a new toe strap. I
felt that if I had Northwave boots, it would have fit just a bit better
to give a better evaluation on the binding overall. I wasn't impressed
with the bindings but I didn't feel they were a huge let-down either.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Drake Muse here
2008-2009 Salomon Absolute
Women's Binding
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Cold with hardpacked groomers and some choppy terrain.
Setup: I rode the Salomon Absolute bindings on the Salomon Loft with my Vans Omni Focus boots.
Time to set up the binding: Longer than average due to making the binding fit properly.
Fit:
It took about 3 tries to get the bindings to properly be fit to my boot
and centered. Each time had to be taken off to fully adjust the
binding. I still don't think the toe strap fit my boot that well
especially not looking at photos up close.
First Impression: Please don't have these ratchets stick like most Salomon ratchets stick. Ah not sticking...YES!
Appearance: It's white and cute. I like the ankle strap look but to me the toe strap just looks funny like a tube sock.
Comfort: I
found the ankle strap very comfortable once it was lined up to my boot.
Molded to my boot and didn't have any pressure points with my boots.
The highback was softer, but very comfortable. The toe strap I felt I had to crank down so that wasn't too comfortable for me.
Functionality: Other
than the lack of adjustibility on the straps, the binding was
functional. I wanted to test the ratchets which I've noticed in the
past that Salomon ratchets are prone to sticking. I didn't have any
issues with these ratchets but I didn't have them for that long either.
Flex: The absolute's offered a good medium flex for freeriding. It was a good flex laterally on the binding, making it easy to pop around to switch riding or 180's.
Response: The absolute's offered up a lot more comfort than response on the mountain. It
was a slower edge to toe response and I didn't feel very comfortable on
the heelside edge with the highback holding the support.
Toe Strap: I
didn't like it that much, in looks or how it felt with my boot. The
quality is there to mold to my boot but I had gaps where it didn't feel
snug against my boot. I also felt like I had to crank it down which
wasn't that comfortable.
Overall Impression: Definitely
a more entry level binding for women riders. I liked the forgiving flex
on it. I think with the combo of the loft, it was a bit too soft for
that board in riding.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Salomon Absolute here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Cold, overcast with hard packed groomed runs.
Setup: I rode the Flux Titans on the O-matic Celebrity with my Vans Omni Focus boots.
Time to set up the binding: A little longer but I give credit when it's freezing out having to turn screws without gloves.
Fit:
The Titans were very good fitting to my boot. Probably the best fit in
terms of the cap strap fitting my boot toe box perfectly. The ankle
strap was more bulky but still secure in fitting my boot, just had to
tighten it harder.
First Impression:
I definitely notice weight when it comes to Flux bindings, they always
weigh more than other bindings I'm used to. Even with weight, the
Titans were plush in comfort. It's like owning a waterbed...it's a
bitch to move, but damn nice to sleep in.
Appearance: I
have seen the Titans for 08-09 in the rainbow which looks amazing but I
rode the Titans in the simple black and brown design. I like the look
of them, very simple with the Flux signature look to the binding.
Comfort: The titans were amazingly comfortable, no pressure points and very secure with my boot.
Functionality:
I need to spend more time with Flux playing around with them to see how
adjustable they are. Every time I get on them, they are adjusted to my
boot just fine so I never have to make any adjustments on the mountain.
As a binding they are functional cause they work, definitely a heavier
binding.
Flex: The
highback is comfortable but offers a good flex when riding, allowing
the rider to dig into heelside turns and hold it steady. With the softer overall flex you can easily maneuver tricks in the bindings, I had no problems with flexing to press.
Response: I
felt a lot more grounded when riding with the titans. That combined
with the ankle strap allows you to hold toeside turns without losing
stability. They offered support and decent response on the mountain without making it a difficult ride.
Toe Strap: It
was perfection to my boot. The capstrap was secure and held my boot
back in the binding with no movement. It was comfortable in design and
snug. Definitely one of my favorite toe straps I rode.
Overall Impression: After
riding a bunch of bindings, getting on Flux is always a nice good ride.
Definitely one of the most comfortable binding companies out there, I
enjoyed the Titans for how they rode. Definitely a fun binding to mess
around with and still give you something to make the freeriding good on
the mountain. I combined it with a more park board which was a good
match.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Flux Titan here
2008-2009 Technine Suerte
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Cold, overcast with hard packed groomed runs.
Setup: I rode the Technine Suerte on the DC XFB with my Vans Omni Focus boots.
Time to set up the binding: Average time
Fit: With
my boot it wasn't the best fit to the toe strap of the binding. My boot
is more rounded and in the 3rd photo below you can actually see that
the toe strap does not mold that well to my boot. I needed to adjust
the bindings better to make it fully match up to my boot toebox.
First Impression: Wow,
this is softer than I expected but really comfortable with the straps.
Lets hope I can make it down without breaking the binding.
Appearance:
I fully expected a band of gangster's to surround me as I rode down the
mountain. Definitely an interesting style, but doesn't suit me at all
in terms of appearance.
Comfort: The ankle strap is very comfortable with a lot of cushioning and molds fine to the boot even though it seemed bulky at first.
Functionality:
Technine has the Baltimore cap strap which definitely offers comfort
while keeping your boot locked into the binding without shifting. I
prefer bindings with regular straps but riding the cap strap has a lot
to offer as well.
Flex: The
suerte's were definitely a softer more park orientated binding offering
a good amount of lateral flex as well as a softer highback with more
flex.
Response:
I found it too soft for freeriding but at the same time super easy to
manuver into buttering and presses. Definitely if I rode park more and
wanted a softer binding, I'd like it a lot.
Toe Strap: Definitely
the fit was off with the toe strap but I like the new design overall.
When it comes to capstrap's having the space in the middle definitely
helps grip the boot and adjust better. It just requires matching it to
your boot which in my case, didn't happen.
Overall Impression: The
Suerte was a functional binding, I needed to adjust the fit better but
even still, it was a softer binding than I would prefer to ride. In
term of quality, every Technine binding I have rode has been very
comfortable while offering a more freestyle softer binding on the
market.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Technine Suerte here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Snowing with hard groomed to packed powder conditions on the runs.
Setup: I rode the Nitro Eris on the Nitro Wiig snowboard with Vans Omni and Vans Omni Focus boots.
Time to set up the binding: Average time
Fit: The
Eris bindings were adjusted to fit my Vans Omni Focus boots so when I
demo'd the Vans Omni boots it wasn't the same fit. When I rode with the
Vans Omni, there was some space between the width of the binding but
when I rode with my Vans Omni Focus I didn't notice it as much. Even
with it, I didn't feel my boot slide around in the binding. The ankle
strap fit snug while the toe strap I should have made an adjustment on.
First Impression: Lets see what Raiden has to offer and damn I hope this combo of the Wiig turns out right.
Appearance:
I checked out the Raiden bindings at SIA, they definitely look good in
person. They aren't too flashy but keep a simple design with good
colors. It just looks good and rides good. That's what a binding should
be.
Comfort: Raiden
changed up the highback for 08-09 giving the Eris a new women's asym
type S highback bringing in the highback molded to a women's calf while
offering a natural feel and fast response. I had no pressure points on
any pieces of the bindings. The ankle strap molded fine with my boot
even with a narrower profile. The toe strap worked fine in comfort, but
to have it grip the boot I had to crank it down.
Functionality: My
only gripe was the toestrap which might have been that I rocked it
regular strap instead of cap strap on the mountain. I didn't crank it
down that tight, so it would slip off my toebox of my boot. Seth told
me later that you definitely need to crank it down tighter if you have
a rounded off toe box. I wish I had tried the strap as a cap strap to
see if that was a better option for my boot. No problems with the new
aluminum buckles and ratchets.
Flex: I
had been riding softer highbacks most of the day so by the time I got
to the Raiden Eris, I enjoyed the stiffer highback that offered a
quicker response when riding. Even with the stiffer highback, it
offered up a stiffer lateral flex to the binding.
Response:
I could really lean on my heelside edge to make each turn and feel the
stable control with the highback. The ankle strap offers good support
without any pressure points and allows you to respond to each toe side
carve without any restrictions.
Toe Strap: I
think the toe strap needs work, maybe something to make it grip the
boots better if you plan to rock it regular on the mountain. Overall
wasn't a bad toe strap but with my boot combo, I would need to tweak it
around more to get it perfected. Next time I'll have to try the toe
strap as a capstrap.
Overall Impression: I
enjoyed riding the eris even with some toe strap difficulty. I thought
the binding definitely offered something to women's bindings without
making it something it's not. It's a lightweight binding, offering good
response and flex without paying a high cost for it. I
definitely see some improvements to be made with the Eris toe strap but
everything else with the binding rode fine and impressed me.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Raiden Eris here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Snowing with hard groomed to packed powder conditions on the runs.
Setup: I rode the Rome Madison bindings on the Rome Blue and my Vans Omni Focus boots (also rode the Rome Vamp boots with this setup)
Time to set up the binding: Average time
Fit: I have no problems with the Madison's fitting my boots, whether I rock the toe strap regular or convertible.
First Impression: I love the Madison's, 3rd year of these bindings and I'll probably pick them up to go with my other 2 years of Madison's.
Appearance:
The Madison has always been a classy, functional binding that rips.
Definitely for 07-08, I really like the look of it. The straps have
some cool design features that collaborate well together. The look this
year is kind of circles/bubbles formation on the highback and straps.
Comfort: This
year the Madison's introduced the new PF Contour Ankle strap, giving
you better comfort closest to your foot and stiffer response on the
material furthest from your foot. The ankle strap compared to previous
years Madison's is softer because of the more emphasis on the comfort
and cushioning of the strap. The toe strap doesn't have any pressure
points and was not very noticeable when riding. The highback keeps with
the same design giving women's riders a binding that matches our calfs.
Functionality: As
much as I love the Madison's and it tears my heart to write this down
but definitely the 08-09 I had one problem with. The new ankle strap is
amazing, it's definitely a plus in terms of making the Madison a better
overall binding with more comfort. However the combo of the material on
the ankle strap being stiff and a new ratchet makes the contact point
weak on the ankle strap. The couple runs I took with the Madison at
Keystone, I had torn a hole through the binding and each time I
ratcheted it down, it would go directly into that point and tear the
hole wider. This only happened on my left binding, the right binding
didn't have the problem with the ratchet hitting that point and causing
a tear. In the second photo I posted up below, you can see the tear and
an idea of what was happening. I forwarded that photo and feedback on
the binding to the Rome Rider Council which really looks for feedback
on the gear, Ron emailed back saying the feedback got forwarded to the
binding designer. I'm hoping the next time I demo the Madison's that
this isn't an issue. It definitely makes me rethink buying the binding,
but also it could be a one-time experience...hard to tell.
Flex:
The Madison keeps the same flex as last year, giving women a medium
flex binding that offers support and response but without being too
aggressive and stiff. It's always been a binding to ride park with,
offering a good lateral flex with give and take...but still capable of
handling the entire mountain.
Response: The
Madison isn't meant to be a quick responsive binding since it's more
all mountain freestyle suited. But it does offer the rider the ability
to adjust the highback rotation and give you more power with the
highback down to the heel and toe padding. For me, the toe ramp allows
me to really carve on my toeside edge without losing any stability.
When I crank down my forward lean, I can drive onto my heelside edge of
my snowboard as well.
Toe Strap: You
can rock the Madison's toe strap either regular or capstrap. Even as a
capstrap it does grip your boot and hold it in. I prefer the regular
toe strap when I ride the Madison's so I rock it that way.
Overall Impression: I
was a bit disappointed by the ankle strap in terms of it tearing, but I
love the binding overall. In terms of a women's binding that is solid
for all types of riding, the Madison offers that. It's a very
adjustable binding that lets the rider control how they want the
binding to behave.
Having owned and rode 2 pairs of Madisons
that are still going strong...it's a binding that lasts. So I was
surprised to see a demo pair that wasn't going to last. I hope to try
them again and see if I got a bad set at the demo.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Rome Madison
here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Bluebird with mixture of groomers to powder runs.
Setup: I rode the Union Trilogy bindings on the Black Death Inc with my Vans Omni Focus boots.
Time to set up the binding: Quicker than average
Fit: I
didn't take a photo of my boot in the binding but the Trilogys were
fine on fitting my boot. In fact these were probably the best fitting
binding that I can remember riding from the demo.
First Impression: Union finally stepped it up on the ladies bindings and I am impressed by the trilogy.
Appearance:
I like bindings that aren't about graphics or bling, simple colors and
Union for me is that company. Putting more time into how a binding
rides than what it looks like. The trilogy is a simple appearance
binding, it looks good without making it blingy, girly or trashy. It
just looks good.
Comfort: Honestly
when I looked at the trilogy's in the catalog and even before stepping
on snow they looked decent but I didn't think they would be that
comfortable. I was really wrong in judging them by looks. The ankle
strap molded perfectly to my boot and is really comfortable without
losing the support. I even put down in my notes "amazing comfort" which
is rare for me to use amazing.
Functionality: I
wanted to mess with the forward lean but did not while riding. It was a
little too intense for me which was good for the first couple runs of
the day but definitely more than I needed. The trilogy is a lighter
binding in terms of weight, the baseplate allows you to feel the board
better. The ratchets worked fine, I thought the toe strap ratchet was
funny looking but worked without any issues.
Flex:
With the stiffer highback, you get really quick heel side response on
the trilogy bindings. I really liked the lateral flex which had some
give to it, allowing the rider to ease into freestyle maneuvers without
losing your freeride/carving capabilities.
Response: Definitely
one of the more aggressive women's bindings that I rode, a stiffer
highback that offers really good heelside response when riding since
you can lay it over and the highback holds your carve, holds your boot
and lets you control it. Did not feel any vibrations under my feet when
hitting up some choppy conditions.
Toe Strap: In
past years I wasn't impressed with the ladies union toe straps but the
trilogy toe strap could be rocked regular or capstrap. It grips onto
your boot which for me is huge since my vans toebox is rounded I need a
toe strap that doesn't slip when riding.
Overall Impression:
I really liked how the Trilogy bindings rode. I've rode Unions before
and wasn't too impressed with the women's bindings but this year with
the Trilogy its definitely a top women's binding to contend with my
other favorites especially for aggressive female riders who want a
stiffer more responsive binding.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Union Trilogy here
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Snowing with hard groomed to packed powder conditions on the runs.
Setup: I rode the Flow Essence bindings with the Flow Infinite 159cm and my Vans Omni Focus Size 8 Boots.
Time to set up the binding: Flow
bindings definitely take a little bit longer to set up in terms of
adjusting the binding properly. The actual setup time is average, but
Greg is pretty dang quick when it comes to setting you up. The
adjustment takes a couple minutes longer, well worth the wait to make
sure you have the binding fully adjusting to your boot.
Fit: No
problem with the essence fitting my boot. In the essence, my boot heel
was snug in the binding but without any grab. The powerstrap fit
properly over my boot and centered. I will point out I do ride boots
with boa and there is no problem with the boa strap and the powerstrap
on the flows.
First Impression: Finally a more aggressive binding that won't let me get lazy and carve up the mountain like I should be.
Appearance:
I like the colors of the essence this year, I rode the essence
featuring white and green. The girly designs on it are minimal and on
the side of the bindings so less noticeable.
Comfort: Flow's
I-Flex powerstrap is all comfort. It eliminates any pressure points
that binding straps can cause on your boots and creates a more evenly
pressured binding strap response and comfort. The essence has one of
the more noticeably softer cushioning pads on the baseplate. Sometimes
with bindings they can be super comfortable but lack the stiffer flex
and response, the flows are an exception to that.
Functionality: As
a flow binding its already one of the most functional easy access in
and out bindings. With the upgrades to the highback, fiber reinforced
and new lever as well as new mini metal ratchets to the essence...it
makes it one sturdy, lightweight, adjustable binding. When I first went
from regular straps to flow bindings, it definitely has an adjustment
period of getting used to using the rear lever to get in and out.
Flex:
The powerstrap on the essence really lets you drive into your toeside
turns while the stiffer highback lets you really drive into your
heelside turns. I definitely liked the stiffer more aggressive flex on
the essence for freeriding since it wouldn't be leniant on me when
riding.
Response: I
noticed right away when riding, the quick responsiveness on heelside
from the highback. It allow allows the binding to be lighter weight and
dualed with the response, definitely a more aggressive binding for
women riders. I found myself applying a little pressure toeside or
heelside and getting quick response just from the small amount.
Power Strap: I
had no problems with the pressure of the powerstrap, in fact when
riding it's hardly noticeable that you are wearing a strap because it
does distribute across your boot.
Overall Impression: The
old days of flows being bulky, heavy and non-responsive are gone. Each
year flow steps it up offering more in their bindings. The essence was
definitely one of the more better built bindings I rode in terms of
offering a women's binding that has just as much as the men's binding
in features. The response was there matched with comfort and quality
makes it a hard binding not to rave about.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Flow Essence here
2008-2009 Burton Lexa EST
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Overcast and cold with hard packed groomed runs.
Setup: I rode the Burton Lexa EST on the Burton Fix with my Vans Omni Focus size 8.
Time to set up the binding: Definitely
longer than reasonable time. I know the EST is supposed to be quick and
easy but every demo, the people setting EST bindings...need to be more
familiar with it.
Fit: The Lexas fit my boot just fine, at first I thought that toe strap wasn't centered but that's the design of it.
First Impression: Finally I can ride a EST binding suited for women that rides with the ICS boards.
Appearance:
I like the appearance of the lexa's this year, the black and white with
blue is simple but looks good. I never noticed the little scissors on
the toe strap ladders until I looked at the photos later.
Comfort: The
lexas are definitely a comfortable binding. I like the changes to the
toe strap this year with allowing making it more off-center aligning.
The ankle strap
is still very
comfortable with good cushioning and flex. The canted highback allows
you to match the angle of your legs and also rotate the highback.
Functionality: The
Lexa EST rides exclusively with the ICS snowboards. Functionality is
always there, it remains the solid binding design that the Lexa is but
allows for unlimited stance options with the ICS system. The ratchets
worked fine, no issues with sticking.
Flex:
The mounting system definitely stiffens up the lateral flex of the
binding than I remember from last years lexa but I liked it because it
made the binding handle better during freeriding and carving. The best
part was riding pipe with the bindings, perfect amount of response and
flex in the pipe.
Response: I liked the quick response with the lexas paired
with the ICS, I had no problems with how the binding handled. The
cushioning in the baseplate specifically on the heel made riding
impacts a lot less and I had no issues with vibrations at higher speeds
on the bindings.
Toe Strap: The
lexa features a new "ultra capstrap" for 08-09 which I preferred over
last years cap strap which was a bit bulkier. This cap molds off-center
over the top of the boot fitting a lot better for non-burton boots.
Overall Impression: Finally
with the womens EST bindings I definitely got a better idea of the ICS
system on the Burton snowboards. You definitely feel more connected to
the snowboard flex as you ride, the lexa is always the epitome of
cushion and comfort. It does make riding a lot more fun with you ride
without noticing your strapped in. My only gripe is the forward lean
but I adjusted the forward lean right off the bat to make it
comfortable for me. It remains a binding that you can ride in many
conditions, handles the conditions with good flex and support.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Burton Lexa EST here
2008-2009 Ride Zeta MVMNT
Women's Binding
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: A mixture of hardpacked groomers, soft powder and bumps.
Setup: I rode the Ride Zeta MVMNT on the Ride Concept UL with my Vans Omni Focus size 8.
Time to set up the binding: Reasonable
Fit: No problem adjusting the fit of the binding to my boot.
First Impression: I hope it rides better than the girly patterns it has on it.
Appearance:
Ride paired up with featured artist tokidoki for 08-09 featuring a
whole line of boards, boots, bindings, and clothing. Having never heard
of Tokidoki and just judging on the appearance of the bindings I
thought it was a bit too much for me.
Comfort: The
Zeta's have always been a comfortable binding for me. The ankle strap
molded to my boot just fine, offered up really good comfort with no
pressure points.
Functionality: Ride
updated the ratchets from last years Zeta's and of course the new toe
strap. Functionality the bindings work, I had no issues with the
ratchets sticking. However
with functionality, because the ankle strap is pre-curved but not on a
hinge system when you are unstrapped it is already in place which to me
is in the way when I'm ready to strap in. If you look at the 2nd
picture below, you'll see what I'm talking about.
Flex:
As a softer freestyle binding, it's got some lateral flex that you can
really have fun with in the park. I found myself having no problems
when buttering and messing around on the snow doing tricks with the
bindings.
Response: It's
a softer binding so I wasn't expecting much from responsiveness on the
snow. Definitely less responsive than the other ride bindings but also
this is a freestyle binding built to be more flex, less responsiveness.
Toe Strap: The Toe strap is Ride's Convertible grip which was offered last year on the mens Alpha bindings. It features "Lightweight
integrated rubber web for super snug boot grip" and that description
actually fits my description as well. The web really does grip to your
boot and molds to it without any fitting issues. I really liked the toe
strap and I rocked it cap strap while riding.
Overall Impression: Last
binding of the day and it didn't disappoint for what it was meant to
be. It's a softer freestyle binding meant to be lightweight and mobile.
The response is less than what I'd like but it's really fun to ride
with especially for doing freestyle tricks. It is a lightweight binding
and definitely one for the ladies to consider when riding park more
often. I had a lot of fun with the binding, definitely let me be more
mellow on the mountain with the softer flex.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the Ride Zeta here
2008-2009 K2 Auto Agogo
Women's Binding
Location: Keystone, Colorado
Snow Conditions: Clear day, hard packed groomers.
Setup: I
rode the K2 Auto Agogo's on the K2 Turbo Dream and my Vans Omni Focus
Boots size 8. I also rode the K2 Auto Agogo's on the K2 Zero setup as
well.
Time to set up the binding: Reasonable
Fit:
These bindings because the toe strap automatically tightens as you
adjust the ankle strap...you will want to make sure the bindings are
properly fit your boot before taking them on the mountain.
First Impression:
Honestly on the mountain with the bindings I had some doubt that when I
was tightening my ankle strap it would tighten the toe strap tight
enough to secure it. That doubt soon passed however.
Appearance:
The binding overall has a sweet design that isn't too girly at first
glimpse. Second Glimpse you notice the graphics of ribbons, pearls and
gold necklaces.
Comfort:
This binding is all comfort whether its in the ankle strap, the
highback or the base. The ankle strap has neoprene gel zones that mold
the strap around your boot.
Functionality:
It's quick to get in (but a bit harder to get out). When you unstrap
the ankle strap, the toe strap takes a second to loosen up and you lift
up with your toe to get out of the binding. It took a couple times to
get used to the auto system but by the end of the demo it came a lot
quicker to me. The ankle strap is set on the hinge mount so when you
are not strapped in, it moves out of the way from the binding. Easy to
adjust the straps while on the mountain, but I did not try to adjust
the toe strap since it was adjusted to fit already. The ankle ratchet
was fine ratcheting up the binding.
Flex:
I prefer a softer flexing binding that allows give and take when
riding, the Agogo definitely offered this. The highback molded great
with my Vans boots and offered enough support and flex when riding.
Response: It's
not a difficult binding to ride, I thought it was fairly easy. The
response is good but it's not overally responsive either giving the
rider a lot of leverage when riding.
Toe Strap:
I rock most of my bindings regular strap, the K2 Auto is a universal
toe strap so you can rock it regular or over the toe cap strap.
Overall Impression:
This was the first binding of the day and I should have saved it for
last. I got used to the only one ratchet to tighten down in the first 3
runs with the binding and when I went back to regular bindings from the
auto...it was kind of a let down. I loved the look and feel of the
binding.
This binding was hands down my favorite of the demos and without a doubt my #1 purchase for next year.
Catalog/on-snow photos of the K2 Auto Agogo
here
[Edited by shayboarder on 5/9/2008 at 7:57 AM]
[Edited by shayboarder on 5/18/2008 at 3:08 PM]