so, i study urban planning. i started out studying architecture, but then switched to urban planning. basically, i found i was more interested in why the architecture was important as a small piece of the landscape, than designing the architecture itself.
one of my classmates once explained the people dont understand urban planning because it is focused on studying what most would consider the everyday mundane. i was reading this article for class this weekend that i found really interesting, and pretty much explains my classmates theory.
The American Metropolis at Century’s End:
Past and Future Influences by Robert Fishman
Rutgers University
The top 10 influences on the American metropolis of the past 50 years are as follows:
1. The 1956 Interstate Highway Act and the dominance of the automobile
2. Federal Housing Administration mortgage financing and subdivision regulation
3. Deindustrialization of central cities
4. Urban renewal: downtown redevelopment and public housing projects (1949 Housing Act)
5. Levittown (the mass-produced suburban tract house)
6. Racial segregation and job discrimination in cities and suburbs
7. Enclosed shopping malls
8. Sun-belt Style Sprawl
9. Air conditioning
10. Urban riots of the 1960s
The 10 most likely influences on the American metropolis for the next 50 years are as follows:
1. Growing disparities of wealth
2. Suburban political majority
3. Aging of the baby boomers
4. Perpetual “underclass” in central cities and inner-ring suburbs
5. “Smart growth”: environmental and planning initiatives to limit sprawl
6. The Internet
7. Deterioration of the “first-ring” post 1945 suburbs
8. Shrinking household size
9. Expanded superhighway system of “outer beltways” to serve new edge cities
10. Racial integration as part of the increasing diversity in cities and suburbs
yes, i find this thoroughly interesting.
Add/View Comments (0)